As an experienced negotiator, US President Donald Trump is accustomed to providing ambiguous answers. When asked by the media how he would respond if China took military action against Taiwan, Trump has always responded by saying that Beijing would never take military action against Taiwan so long as he is in power — therefore, it is a non-issue. Although his response is true, those skeptical of the US argue it demonstrates a lack of a clear commitment.
After Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) on Monday last week announced it would invest an additional US$100 billion into the US — much to Trump’s delight — reporters once again asked Trump about the issue of China invading Taiwan. Trump responded by saying the US would have “a big impact if something should happen with Taiwan.” In other words, when TSMC is willing to become a lifelong partner of the US, Trump’s level of commitment appears to increase.
Trump’s response echoes a statement made by his old friend, former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe. If Taiwan is in trouble, the US is in trouble.
With its investment, TSMC has made a significant contribution to the advancement of Taiwan’s foreign diplomacy and national security. Although the move undoubtedly warrants respect, it is not a sacrifice on TSMC’s part — it is extremely beneficial for the company.
Trump had originally threatened tariffs if TSMC did not rescue Intel, but with the Taiwanese firm committing to setting up more plants in the US, it can leave Intel to fend for itself — TSMC does not have to worry anymore about getting burned.
Trump is also attempting to use this deal to end the semiconductor subsidy program passed during the administration of former US president Joe Biden — the CHIPS and Science Act — which is good for TSMC.
With each generation of semiconductors, the investment required is increasing. TSMC’s capital expenditure is expected to reach US$38 billion to US$42 billion this year — a level that its financially struggling competitors could not even dream of matching. The US$3.9 billion in subsidies and US$7.5 billion in loans provided by the Biden administration, if fully utilized, would provide TSMC’s main competitors with the financial means to compete.
If Trump’s push to repeal these subsidies is successful, it would ultimately ensure that TSMC remains the industry’s undisputed leader.
Taiwan has long hoped to establish its own great multinational corporations, and TSMC has already reached that stage. However, the challenges of adapting to other countries’ labor laws and government regulations have hampered its willingness to expand. Trump gave them a push, urging TSMC to grow and accelerate its understanding of multinational operations.
TSMC decentralizing its research and development (R&D) efforts provides the company with increased security and stability. Intel was once invincible until its core R&D team in the US went down the wrong path with its Pentium 4 processor — it was the Israeli R&D team that developed the Pentium M processor, ultimately saving the entire company. Industrial development requires bold steps forward — remaining stagnant is not an option.
TSMC is in its heyday. However, once an industry reaches its peak, it would inevitably and gradually enter a phase of maturity. Intel’s position in the industry was once far higher than TSMC’s today, and Nokia was once Finland’s sacred protector — today, neither company is as remotely influential. This is simply a part of the natural rise and decline of the industrial cycle. For a country to develop sustainably, it should not cling to its “sacred protectors” — rather, it should continuously foster new generations of industries.
TSMC has absorbed a large amount of talent. Coupled with the impact of Taiwan’s low birthrates, other industries are now often forced to hire anyone who possesses basic skills, thereby leading to a shortage of employees in the fields of science and engineering. This is partly because many university graduates directly enter TSMC, with few choosing to pursue studies abroad for a graduate or doctorate degree.
TSMC alone brings in a significant amount of foreign currency, which places great pressure on the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar. Other export industries face disadvantages as a result. Given this situation, how can Taiwan effectively nurture the next industry?
Taiwanese should welcome TSMC’s decision to redistribute a portion of its production capacity to the international market and release some resources. There is no need to worry about the loss of the nation’s so-called “silicon shield.” The US has been protecting Taiwan since the Korean War — did Taiwan have a semiconductor industry back then?
Tommy Lin is president of the Formosa Republican Association and the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS