As an experienced negotiator, US President Donald Trump is accustomed to providing ambiguous answers. When asked by the media how he would respond if China took military action against Taiwan, Trump has always responded by saying that Beijing would never take military action against Taiwan so long as he is in power — therefore, it is a non-issue. Although his response is true, those skeptical of the US argue it demonstrates a lack of a clear commitment.
After Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) on Monday last week announced it would invest an additional US$100 billion into the US — much to Trump’s delight — reporters once again asked Trump about the issue of China invading Taiwan. Trump responded by saying the US would have “a big impact if something should happen with Taiwan.” In other words, when TSMC is willing to become a lifelong partner of the US, Trump’s level of commitment appears to increase.
Trump’s response echoes a statement made by his old friend, former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe. If Taiwan is in trouble, the US is in trouble.
With its investment, TSMC has made a significant contribution to the advancement of Taiwan’s foreign diplomacy and national security. Although the move undoubtedly warrants respect, it is not a sacrifice on TSMC’s part — it is extremely beneficial for the company.
Trump had originally threatened tariffs if TSMC did not rescue Intel, but with the Taiwanese firm committing to setting up more plants in the US, it can leave Intel to fend for itself — TSMC does not have to worry anymore about getting burned.
Trump is also attempting to use this deal to end the semiconductor subsidy program passed during the administration of former US president Joe Biden — the CHIPS and Science Act — which is good for TSMC.
With each generation of semiconductors, the investment required is increasing. TSMC’s capital expenditure is expected to reach US$38 billion to US$42 billion this year — a level that its financially struggling competitors could not even dream of matching. The US$3.9 billion in subsidies and US$7.5 billion in loans provided by the Biden administration, if fully utilized, would provide TSMC’s main competitors with the financial means to compete.
If Trump’s push to repeal these subsidies is successful, it would ultimately ensure that TSMC remains the industry’s undisputed leader.
Taiwan has long hoped to establish its own great multinational corporations, and TSMC has already reached that stage. However, the challenges of adapting to other countries’ labor laws and government regulations have hampered its willingness to expand. Trump gave them a push, urging TSMC to grow and accelerate its understanding of multinational operations.
TSMC decentralizing its research and development (R&D) efforts provides the company with increased security and stability. Intel was once invincible until its core R&D team in the US went down the wrong path with its Pentium 4 processor — it was the Israeli R&D team that developed the Pentium M processor, ultimately saving the entire company. Industrial development requires bold steps forward — remaining stagnant is not an option.
TSMC is in its heyday. However, once an industry reaches its peak, it would inevitably and gradually enter a phase of maturity. Intel’s position in the industry was once far higher than TSMC’s today, and Nokia was once Finland’s sacred protector — today, neither company is as remotely influential. This is simply a part of the natural rise and decline of the industrial cycle. For a country to develop sustainably, it should not cling to its “sacred protectors” — rather, it should continuously foster new generations of industries.
TSMC has absorbed a large amount of talent. Coupled with the impact of Taiwan’s low birthrates, other industries are now often forced to hire anyone who possesses basic skills, thereby leading to a shortage of employees in the fields of science and engineering. This is partly because many university graduates directly enter TSMC, with few choosing to pursue studies abroad for a graduate or doctorate degree.
TSMC alone brings in a significant amount of foreign currency, which places great pressure on the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar. Other export industries face disadvantages as a result. Given this situation, how can Taiwan effectively nurture the next industry?
Taiwanese should welcome TSMC’s decision to redistribute a portion of its production capacity to the international market and release some resources. There is no need to worry about the loss of the nation’s so-called “silicon shield.” The US has been protecting Taiwan since the Korean War — did Taiwan have a semiconductor industry back then?
Tommy Lin is president of the Formosa Republican Association and the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS