As an experienced negotiator, US President Donald Trump is accustomed to providing ambiguous answers. When asked by the media how he would respond if China took military action against Taiwan, Trump has always responded by saying that Beijing would never take military action against Taiwan so long as he is in power — therefore, it is a non-issue. Although his response is true, those skeptical of the US argue it demonstrates a lack of a clear commitment.
After Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) on Monday last week announced it would invest an additional US$100 billion into the US — much to Trump’s delight — reporters once again asked Trump about the issue of China invading Taiwan. Trump responded by saying the US would have “a big impact if something should happen with Taiwan.” In other words, when TSMC is willing to become a lifelong partner of the US, Trump’s level of commitment appears to increase.
Trump’s response echoes a statement made by his old friend, former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe. If Taiwan is in trouble, the US is in trouble.
With its investment, TSMC has made a significant contribution to the advancement of Taiwan’s foreign diplomacy and national security. Although the move undoubtedly warrants respect, it is not a sacrifice on TSMC’s part — it is extremely beneficial for the company.
Trump had originally threatened tariffs if TSMC did not rescue Intel, but with the Taiwanese firm committing to setting up more plants in the US, it can leave Intel to fend for itself — TSMC does not have to worry anymore about getting burned.
Trump is also attempting to use this deal to end the semiconductor subsidy program passed during the administration of former US president Joe Biden — the CHIPS and Science Act — which is good for TSMC.
With each generation of semiconductors, the investment required is increasing. TSMC’s capital expenditure is expected to reach US$38 billion to US$42 billion this year — a level that its financially struggling competitors could not even dream of matching. The US$3.9 billion in subsidies and US$7.5 billion in loans provided by the Biden administration, if fully utilized, would provide TSMC’s main competitors with the financial means to compete.
If Trump’s push to repeal these subsidies is successful, it would ultimately ensure that TSMC remains the industry’s undisputed leader.
Taiwan has long hoped to establish its own great multinational corporations, and TSMC has already reached that stage. However, the challenges of adapting to other countries’ labor laws and government regulations have hampered its willingness to expand. Trump gave them a push, urging TSMC to grow and accelerate its understanding of multinational operations.
TSMC decentralizing its research and development (R&D) efforts provides the company with increased security and stability. Intel was once invincible until its core R&D team in the US went down the wrong path with its Pentium 4 processor — it was the Israeli R&D team that developed the Pentium M processor, ultimately saving the entire company. Industrial development requires bold steps forward — remaining stagnant is not an option.
TSMC is in its heyday. However, once an industry reaches its peak, it would inevitably and gradually enter a phase of maturity. Intel’s position in the industry was once far higher than TSMC’s today, and Nokia was once Finland’s sacred protector — today, neither company is as remotely influential. This is simply a part of the natural rise and decline of the industrial cycle. For a country to develop sustainably, it should not cling to its “sacred protectors” — rather, it should continuously foster new generations of industries.
TSMC has absorbed a large amount of talent. Coupled with the impact of Taiwan’s low birthrates, other industries are now often forced to hire anyone who possesses basic skills, thereby leading to a shortage of employees in the fields of science and engineering. This is partly because many university graduates directly enter TSMC, with few choosing to pursue studies abroad for a graduate or doctorate degree.
TSMC alone brings in a significant amount of foreign currency, which places great pressure on the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar. Other export industries face disadvantages as a result. Given this situation, how can Taiwan effectively nurture the next industry?
Taiwanese should welcome TSMC’s decision to redistribute a portion of its production capacity to the international market and release some resources. There is no need to worry about the loss of the nation’s so-called “silicon shield.” The US has been protecting Taiwan since the Korean War — did Taiwan have a semiconductor industry back then?
Tommy Lin is president of the Formosa Republican Association and the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS