Taiwan is facing the challenge of limited international participation and a lack of formal government-to-government channels through which it can communicate its interests. Despite China’s relentless efforts to diplomatically isolate Taiwan, the nation remains an important economic and technological partner for numerous countries.
However, the increasing pressure from Beijing — manifested through diplomatic poaching, restricted participation in global institutions, economic coercion and military intimidation — has made unconventional diplomatic strategies crucial. Over the past eight years, Taiwan has countered that isolation by leveraging soft power.
Among those efforts, think tank and civil society diplomacy have emerged as vital tools in non-governmental diplomacy. Taiwan’s think tanks are central to shaping its international narrative, offering perspectives that transcend the dominant China-focused lens. A key element of think tank diplomacy is producing policy-oriented research that contributes to global discourse, ensuring Taiwan’s viewpoints are well represented in Western academic literature. Yet, despite their growing importance, those institutions remain underutilized.
For decades, Taiwan’s think tank culture was predominantly inward-focused, primarily analyzing cross-strait relations and ties with the US. However, since 2016, it has undergone significant evolution, drawing inspiration from the think tank diplomacy of other countries.
As global geopolitics shift, think tanks have become indispensable conduits for foreign policy. Although Taiwan was slow to recognize their potential, that realization came at a critical moment. With China suspending dialogue following the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) rise to power in 2016, Taiwan’s international isolation deepened. In response, then-president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) spearheaded the establishment of several think tanks to enhance global outreach and communicate Taiwan’s perspective. One such institution, the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, has played a crucial role in conducting war simulations domestically and internationally, strengthening the nation’s defense strategy.
Taiwan’s think tank landscape has since transformed. No longer mere academic observers, those institutions now shape policymaking. High-level foreign policy dialogues are hosted by multidisciplinary think tanks, such as the Ketagalan Forum, which focuses on Indo-Pacific geopolitics, and the Yushan Forum — organized by the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation — which fosters ties with New Southbound Policy partner countries while projecting Taiwan’s soft power. Amidst geopolitical turmoil and the ongoing threat from China, it is crucial for Taiwan to continue empowering those annual foreign policy dialogues.
The upcoming Yushan Forum, now one of Taiwan’s most important international dialogue platforms, would facilitate exchanges with policymakers and academics from countries where the China factor is prominent, providing an essential avenue for discourse. The theme of this year’s forum, “New Southbound Policy+: Taiwan, the Indo-Pacific, and the New World,” aligns with President William Lai’s (賴清德) foreign policy strategy, which aims to deepen Taiwan’s engagement with neighboring countries and address Indo-Pacific dynamics. Key topics for discussion would include smart solutions, technology and economic cooperation. Expanding those dialogues is essential for enhancing Taiwan’s outreach and bridging gaps between academia, policymakers, think tanks and civil society. Events such as the Halifax Forum, held in Taipei for the first time last month, are also increasing Taiwan’s international visibility.
To maximize their potential, think tanks require consistent government support, strategic partnerships and financial stability. Opposition political parties should not hinder funding, as those institutions are integral to shaping policy, fostering dialogue and advancing Taiwan’s global engagement. Regardless of ideological differences, think tanks should be regarded as vital assets for strengthening the nation’s strategic vision. The government must empower existing think tanks and encourage collaboration between the public and private sectors to maximize their impact.
Taiwan should also invest in regional area studies by establishing institutions such as a Taiwan-US Institute, Taiwan-Australia Institute or Taiwan-India Institute, given the growing importance of those relationships. Expanding expertise in those areas would bolster Taiwan’s understanding of its key partners, improve its diplomatic positioning and enhance its global influence.
Furthermore, Taiwan must attract more international think tanks, especially from Asia. Singapore, often perceived as neutral, has become a think tank hub. Taiwan, with its dynamic academic and policy environment, could establish itself as a regional center for intellectual exchange. Hosting foreign think tanks would foster collaboration with existing Taiwanese institutions and further elevate the nation’s global standing. Taiwanese representative offices should take a more active role in lobbying for the expansion of international think tanks in Taiwan.
A stronger foreign think tank presence would enrich Taiwan’s strategic culture and increase its global relevance. If institutions such as the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace can operate in China, India and Russia, and India’s Observer Research Foundation (ORF) has a presence in the US and the Middle East, then the establishment of Carnegie Taiwan or ORF Taiwan is entirely feasible. Such institutions would promote research collaboration and deepen Taiwan’s engagement with New Southbound Policy partner countries, where outreach remains constrained.
By prioritizing think tank diplomacy, Taiwan can navigate geopolitical challenges, build strategic partnerships and ensure its voice is heard on the global stage. In a shifting geopolitical landscape marked by ongoing conflicts, think tanks can function as extensions of the government — interpreting global perspectives while effectively conveying Taiwan’s worldview. Think tanks can reach where governments cannot, and in Taiwan, they should be seen as complementary to policymaking and further cultivated.
Alan H. Yang is a professor at National Chengchi University and executive director at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation. Sana Hashmi is a fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS