Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals and cultural figures were killed.
The second incident on Feb. 28 occurred in 1980 after the Formosa Incident of Dec. 10, 1979 — also known as the Kaohsiung Incident. That day, chaos broke out at a Human Rights Day rally organized by democracy leaders associated with Formosa Magazine after police officers surrounded the crowd and deployed tear gas. Lin I-hsiung (林義雄), a lawyer and democracy advocate who was later a Democratic Progressive Party chairman, traveled to Kaohsiung to gain a better understanding of the situation and help handle it, but he was charged with treason and wrongfully imprisoned.
On Feb. 28, 1980, as his wife, Fang Su-min (方素敏), was visiting him in prison, a person whose identity remains unknown broke into Lin’s house on Xinyi Road in Taipei, murdering his mother and twin daughters. His eldest daughter, who was just nine at the time, was critically injured, but survived after emergency treatment.
Lin’s home was under close surveillance and evidence shows that this brutal act was likely carried out by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government on the anniversary of the 228 Incident to intimidate those involved in the pro-democracy movement.
The 228 Incident was an attempt to eliminate all obstacles to the exiled colonial government’s power in Taiwan. It has been 78 years since then. The Lin family murders served to suppress Taiwan’s democratization movement. It has been 37 years since then. The 228 Incident occurred just two years after Taiwan welcomed the “motherland,” while the murders took place just two months after the Formosa Incident. The history of the KMT’s rule over Taiwan is stained with blood.
Following the 228 Incident, why did the KMT execute intellectuals and cultural figures who were members of the 228 Incident Committee? Painter Chen Cheng-po (陳澄波) from Chiayi County, for example, was shot in front of Chiayi railway station after attempting to negotiate with the government. His body was displayed outside the station for several days. Chen’s execution was obviously a political move by the Republic of China (ROC) government to clear intellectual and cultural obstacles to its rule.
Tragedies such as this occurred despite many Taiwanese elites having high expectations for the “motherland,” truly believing that the ROC would be the first democratic country in Asia. The intellectuals and cultural figures who were sacrificed firmly believed that they had not broken any laws nor engaged in rebellion — rather, they hoped that Taiwan could transition from a colonized territory to a normal democratic nation. They were victims of their own mistaken beliefs — based on the legal conditions of the Japanese colonial period — that the ROC was a democratic and law-abiding country.
The Lin family murders marked one of the most egregious series of mistakes in the history of the KMT’s rule. Lin and Fang overcame the grief of losing most of their family. After traveling abroad and returning home, Lin proposed a first draft of the “Constitution of the Republic of Taiwan,” started the Chilin Foundation, established the Chilin Social Movement Academy and advocated for other civil society movements. At the Chilin Cultural and Education Center in Yilan County’s Wujie Township (五結), he constructed historical archives, a concert hall and a social movement institute, as well as hosting art exhibitions among other endeavors. He sowed love in a land marked by bloodshed, reflecting the history of Taiwan’s post-World War II democratization movement.
While reflecting upon the two tragic incidents that occurred on this day in 1947 and 1980, Taiwanese must have a sense of historical awareness and protect their developing nation. Taiwan’s democratization was achieved through blood, sweat and tears — its people must cherish and protect it regardless of their age, passing it down through the generations to shape a new history.
Feb. 28 is a day of national mourning, not of fun and entertainment — Taiwanese must not overlook the significance of its commemoration.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
RSS