Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals and cultural figures were killed.
The second incident on Feb. 28 occurred in 1980 after the Formosa Incident of Dec. 10, 1979 — also known as the Kaohsiung Incident. That day, chaos broke out at a Human Rights Day rally organized by democracy leaders associated with Formosa Magazine after police officers surrounded the crowd and deployed tear gas. Lin I-hsiung (林義雄), a lawyer and democracy advocate who was later a Democratic Progressive Party chairman, traveled to Kaohsiung to gain a better understanding of the situation and help handle it, but he was charged with treason and wrongfully imprisoned.
On Feb. 28, 1980, as his wife, Fang Su-min (方素敏), was visiting him in prison, a person whose identity remains unknown broke into Lin’s house on Xinyi Road in Taipei, murdering his mother and twin daughters. His eldest daughter, who was just nine at the time, was critically injured, but survived after emergency treatment.
Lin’s home was under close surveillance and evidence shows that this brutal act was likely carried out by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government on the anniversary of the 228 Incident to intimidate those involved in the pro-democracy movement.
The 228 Incident was an attempt to eliminate all obstacles to the exiled colonial government’s power in Taiwan. It has been 78 years since then. The Lin family murders served to suppress Taiwan’s democratization movement. It has been 37 years since then. The 228 Incident occurred just two years after Taiwan welcomed the “motherland,” while the murders took place just two months after the Formosa Incident. The history of the KMT’s rule over Taiwan is stained with blood.
Following the 228 Incident, why did the KMT execute intellectuals and cultural figures who were members of the 228 Incident Committee? Painter Chen Cheng-po (陳澄波) from Chiayi County, for example, was shot in front of Chiayi railway station after attempting to negotiate with the government. His body was displayed outside the station for several days. Chen’s execution was obviously a political move by the Republic of China (ROC) government to clear intellectual and cultural obstacles to its rule.
Tragedies such as this occurred despite many Taiwanese elites having high expectations for the “motherland,” truly believing that the ROC would be the first democratic country in Asia. The intellectuals and cultural figures who were sacrificed firmly believed that they had not broken any laws nor engaged in rebellion — rather, they hoped that Taiwan could transition from a colonized territory to a normal democratic nation. They were victims of their own mistaken beliefs — based on the legal conditions of the Japanese colonial period — that the ROC was a democratic and law-abiding country.
The Lin family murders marked one of the most egregious series of mistakes in the history of the KMT’s rule. Lin and Fang overcame the grief of losing most of their family. After traveling abroad and returning home, Lin proposed a first draft of the “Constitution of the Republic of Taiwan,” started the Chilin Foundation, established the Chilin Social Movement Academy and advocated for other civil society movements. At the Chilin Cultural and Education Center in Yilan County’s Wujie Township (五結), he constructed historical archives, a concert hall and a social movement institute, as well as hosting art exhibitions among other endeavors. He sowed love in a land marked by bloodshed, reflecting the history of Taiwan’s post-World War II democratization movement.
While reflecting upon the two tragic incidents that occurred on this day in 1947 and 1980, Taiwanese must have a sense of historical awareness and protect their developing nation. Taiwan’s democratization was achieved through blood, sweat and tears — its people must cherish and protect it regardless of their age, passing it down through the generations to shape a new history.
Feb. 28 is a day of national mourning, not of fun and entertainment — Taiwanese must not overlook the significance of its commemoration.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS