Tomorrow is the 78th anniversary of the 228 Incident. On Monday, at a meeting with the Overseas 2-28 Survivors Homecoming Group at the Presidential Office, President William Lai (賴清德) spoke of the importance of protecting the nation’s freedom and sovereignty.
The 228 Incident is in the past, but the generational trauma exists in the present. The imperative to protect the nation’s sovereignty and liberty from Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aggression will remain for the foreseeable future.
The chaos and budget cuts in the legislature threaten the endeavor. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have worked together to slash the central government’s budget, including the national defense budget, severely restricting its ability to make the required increases in defense spending.
As Masahiro Matsumura writes on today’s page: “The current state of Taiwanese politics is a deviant outlier in the sense that the nation as a whole is playing with fire when its own national security is in jeopardy.”
Even though the KMT recognizes the importance of national defense and working closely with the US in deterring CCP aggression, its continued obstruction is difficult to square with its purported position. The KMT says it does not want to provoke Beijing. It prefers to pander to the CCP, while China continues to provoke Taiwan unchecked.
The standoff between the governing Democratic Progressive Party and the opposition parties goes beyond domestic politics; the cuts and the wavering are being watched closely by Beijing and Washington. Last month, when Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) led a cross-party group of legislators to attend US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, they were questioned by members of the US Congress and think tanks about the budget cuts, including the freezing of funds for the indigenous submarine program.
On Tuesday this week, US House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the US and the CCP member Raja Krishnamoorthi and committee chairman John Moolenaar spoke at the Brookings Institution to discuss how Congress would approach relations between the US and China. Specifically on Taiwan, Krishnamoorthi said that enabling Taiwan to have a strong defense was integral to the US’ ability to deter CPP aggression; Moolenaar added that the debate within Taiwan itself about defense, although a sign of a robust democracy, was concerning and sends the wrong message, both to the CCP and to the US.
Nobody wants to help someone who shows little regard for helping themselves. If the KMT and TPP want to know what Trump might think about the cuts, reducing the percentage of GDP allotted to defense, they only need to look at what is happening in Europe.
Increasing defense spending and preparedness has never been as urgent as it is now, especially with uncertainty in the international order. The government needs to look at ways to achieve its ends within the constraints of the domestic political situation, until such time as it once again has a legislative majority.
On Jan. 14, Lai held a national security meeting announcing key priorities on national defense spending, with the promise of seeking a special budget to ensure national defense spending reaches at least 3 percent of GDP, among other initiatives. The special budget would be a workaround, and yet it still needs to get past the opposition.
Matsumura suggests other ways of working within the constraints imposed by the KMT and TPP, essentially by prioritizing where the budget is to be allocated, in particular to short-term and asymmetric capabilities, not medium-term, big-ticket programs or long-term research and development projects. An example of this would be to emphasize drone capabilities and to sacrifice further development of the indigenous submarine program.
While the government makes these adjustments, the KMT needs to stop pussyfooting around before a crouching tiger.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS