Over the past few years, fake investment scams have flooded major social media forums and chat platforms across the Internet, creating a major social dilemma. Those ads try to lure people with promises of high profit and low risk, baiting them into joining huge investment chat rooms that ultimately convince them to unwittingly give large amounts of money to complete strangers before kicking them out and blocking them.
The government needs to respond to that issue by adding addendums to the Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act (詐欺犯罪危害防制條例), in particular by implementing real-name systems for advertising. Even then, scammers could still use overseas and shell companies to continue placing fraudulent ads, creating challenges for the enforcement of new regulations.
Shell companies are often located outside of Taiwan’s jurisdiction, making it difficult for law enforcement to trace those groups’ identities. Law enforcement once hoped to limit overseas advertising, but authorities were concerned such a move might mistakenly kill off legitimate advertising as well. That concern has led to the stalling of additional legal provisions, allowing criminal rings to continue using overseas resources to advertise fraudulent investments.
To effectively clamp down on fake investment scams, police are urging the Ministry of Digital Affairs to implement source management, demanding that platforms enact strict audits of advertisers. A feasible method would be for platforms to first restrict clients who have uploaded investment scam advertising before from ever again publishing ads on their platform.
Second, the ministry could enforce heavy penalties on platforms that have not complied with the law. Implementing those two actions would raise the costs for scammers seeking to use overseas or shell companies, effectively reducing the volume of fraudulent investment ads.
Criminal Investigation Bureau statistics showed that out of all fake investment ads published on platforms last year, Facebook came was the most-used platform, with more than 119,181 instances. Those ads often claim to be vouched for by well-known or respected company leaders, financial gurus, Internet celebrities and politicians to entice people to join the fraud group’s Line investment chat groups, which in turn fleece viewers.
Those data reveal the severity of fake investment scams and social media platforms’ insufficient response in terms of ad monitoring and management. Although new regulations have placed higher demands on those platforms, their actual enforcement has yet to be seen.
The ministry should bolster supervision of these platforms to ensure the strict enforcement of real-name systems and identity verification mechanisms for advertisers. Platforms must do their best to use technological means to identify and filter fraudulent ads, and reduce the transmission of fraudulent ads at the source, thereby helping lower the workload placed on grassroots anti-fraud personnel. Through multiparty cooperation, we can clamp down on the flood of fake investment scams, and protect the public’s property and assets.
Lin Cheng-wu is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Tim Smith
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS