US President Donald Trump on Thursday directed the US trade representative and commerce secretary to complete all studies related to the so-called reciprocal tariffs by April 1, as he aims to increase US tariffs to match the rates other countries charge on imports. The calculation for the reciprocal tariffs includes not only the countries’ tariff rates, but also their non-tariff barriers, such as subsidies to industries, regulations, value-added taxes, exchange rate policies, and intellectual property protection and enforcement.
For decades, the US has set tariffs through negotiations at international trade bodies, such as the WTO. Trump wants to break with global trade norms and leave it entirely up to US officials to set tariffs based on their own calculations. It diverges from the multilateral framework under the WTO, which aims to constrain powerful economies and minimize economic bullying in international trade. Trump believes that countries with huge trade surpluses with Washington are taking advantage of the US, and that the decline in the country’s manufacturing and the disappearance of jobs are all caused by trading partners’ unfair practices. Therefore, his decision to roll out reciprocal tariffs would help reduce trade deficits, protect domestic industries and restore fairness, the White House said in a fact sheet.
It is hard to gauge the effects of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs on other countries and the global economy, because it is unclear how the new rates would be calculated and there are no concrete details. However, as the rates to be charged would be studied over the next few weeks, that provides an opportunity for countries to negotiate with the US before any new tariffs are imposed.
Taiwan could be a target of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. Last year, it was the sixth-largest contributor to the US trade deficit, at US$74 billion, following China, Mexico, Vietnam, Ireland and Germany, but ahead of Japan, South Korea, Canada and India, data provider CEIC said. Meanwhile, WTO data showed that Taiwan’s average nominal tariff rate for imported goods is 6.5 percent, while the average US tariff rate is 3.3 percent, with the tariff disparity between the two sides particularly notable in the agricultural and transportation equipment sectors.
The effects of reciprocal tariffs might be broader than expected for Taiwan, as the US has indicated that non-tariff barriers, such as value-added taxes and exchange rate policies, could also be grounds for the new tariffs, making the potential effects unpredictable. Trump has previously raised issues with Taiwan over semiconductors and threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwanese chips. Some experts said that Taiwan would remain largely unaffected, as the nation’s direct semiconductor exports to the US are relatively modest. Many Taiwanese chips are assembled into finished electronic products, such as servers, mobile phones and computers, either in Taiwan or third-party countries before being shipped to the US. However, others said Trump could use tariff threats to achieve other goals, such as pressuring Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co to increase US investments or collaborate with Intel Corp in the foundry business.
So far, President William Lai (賴清德) has pledged to boost Taiwan’s investment in the US and spend more on national defense in response to Trump’s tariff threat. Lai’s administration should also push for a major trade negotiation with the US, as the countries make fierce diplomatic efforts to avoid more tariffs. The government must also establish a special team composed of diplomatic personnel, and officials from national security, defense, finance and economic ministries to regularly visit the US and communicate with White House officials. In addition, the government needs to take more measures to support key domestic industries that are likely to be hit by rising global economic pressures if the WTO system collapses and countries all move to protect their industries.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS