After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats.
Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold.
The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again hastily pushed through hundreds of illogical and error-ridden motions to slash the government budget without discussion just days before the holiday began late last month, calls to recall KMT legislators who are “unfit to serve” grew stronger.
Civil society rose up and launched mass recall campaigns against most KMT legislators (the TPP only has at-large legislators who cannot be recalled), out of concerns, fear and anger that their actions are meant to sabotage government operations and dismantle Taiwan’s stability and democracy, possibly in collusion with the Chinese Communist Party.
Perhaps out of fear over the overwhelming response to the mass recall, the legislature at 4:47pm the day before the Lunar New Year holiday began suddenly sent to the Executive Yuan its amendments to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法), which would make recalls more difficult. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) had said the Cabinet would return the bill, asking the legislature to reconsider it.
The motion for reconsideration must be sent to the legislature within 10 days (by today). The legislature is expected to reject the motion and send the bill back to the president for promulgation. Petitions to formally recall elected officials can only be accepted a year after they took office, which was on Saturday. Many people believe the tightened recall threshold would take effect by the middle of this month.
By sending the bill to the Cabinet only an hour before the holiday started, KMT lawmakers might have believed they succeeded in their “sneak attack” to counter recall efforts, but they have instead inadvertently started the countdown to their recall, as civic groups made greater efforts in the limited timeframe to collect as many signatures as they could during the holiday, for formal submission this week.
The ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) attitude toward the campaigns remains ambiguous, as it is trying to walk a fine line between offering support and not taking charge. DPP legislative caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) called for a “mass recall” of KMT legislators, while President William Lai (賴清德) took a mild tone, urging respect for civic groups’ autonomy.
As civic groups reported that they have received signatures exceeding the minimum requirements of the first-phase recall petition for more than a dozen KMT lawmakers, KMT officials have also announced plans to launch their own recalls to “counter” the DPP, which could cause a wave of “revenge recalls.”
Recall campaigns and counter-campaigns are likely to bring about political turmoil and escalate into a slugfest. Groups need to collect more signatures within 60 days if the first-phase recall petition is passed, while the KMT and TPP frame them as driven and sponsored by the DPP, and launch their own attacks. In the coming days, the DPP must constantly re-evaluate and adjust their role if they wish to see the campaigns succeed.
Civic groups must step up their game to persuade neutral voters that their cause is logical and necessary to protect the common values of Taiwan, a constitutional democracy, explaining the impact of the KMT and TPP amendments in simple and objective terms to the public, who are unfamiliar with political details, while reminding them of their power to make a difference, or they might easily be labeled as “troublemakers” causing instability and distrust in society.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
RSS