On Jan. 6, Indonesia was officially accepted as a full member of the BRICS group. While this development might not have a direct or immediate impact on Taiwan, it could shift the geopolitical dynamics in the Asia-Pacific region.
First, BRICS, as an economic bloc, harbors diverse geopolitical interests among its member states. China considers Taiwan an “inseparable part of its territory,” and Brazil, Russia, India and South Africa generally support the “one China” policy, although not all actively endorse China’s stance on Taiwan.
Indonesia’s membership in BRICS brings Jakarta closer to China’s economic diplomacy, which might influence Indonesia’s approach to sensitive issues, including Taiwan.
Second, Indonesia’s accession to BRICS presents an opportunity for China, a key player in the bloc, to strengthen its regional influence, particularly in Southeast Asia. If China uses the BRICS platform to reinforce its diplomatic narrative on Taiwan, this could complicate the position of countries in the region, including Indonesia, in remaining neutral on Taiwan.
Despite Indonesia’s non-aligned diplomatic tradition, joining BRICS could create indirect pressure from China to align more closely with its agenda. Taiwan has sought to foster informal and economic ties with Southeast Asian countries through the New Southbound Policy. However, Indonesia’s membership in BRICS might diminish Taiwan’s opportunities to strengthen bilateral relations with Indonesia and other Southeast Asian nations, especially if Indonesia’s economic cooperation with China deepens.
Third, Indonesia in BRICS brings the bloc closer to Southeast Asia, especially with countries such as Thailand, Malaysia and Vietnam serving as BRICS partners. With an increased BRICS presence in Southeast Asia, Taiwan might face challenges in maintaining its relevance and diplomatic space in the region, particularly if Indonesia chooses to support more pro-China policies.
Fourth, Taiwan is a major player in the global semiconductor industry. At the same time, BRICS, particularly China and India, are striving to enhance their technological independence, including in the semiconductor sector.
Indonesia in BRICS could open up opportunities for technological cooperation with China and India. This could lead to more competition with Taiwan.
These concerns might be overstated when considering Indonesia’s “free-active” diplomacy principle, which enables the country to maintain good relations with all parties, including Taiwan.
Indonesia has never had official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, but it has consistently maintained strong economic ties.
As a relatively neutral member of BRICS, Indonesia has an opportunity to play a mediating role in sensitive regional issues, including tensions between China and Taiwan.
Taiwan must ensure that its relationship with Indonesia remains strong, particularly in the economic and trade sectors. Taiwan could enhance its investments in strategic sectors such as renewable energy and technology, which align with Indonesia’s development priorities.
Taiwan needs to adopt a flexible diplomatic approach to maintain its relevance in the region, perhaps by focusing on non-political cooperation in areas such as education, technology and healthcare. Taiwan’s economic ties with Indonesia still hold significant potential, if the two sides could separate geopolitical issues from their bilateral cooperation.
Najamuddin Khairur Rijal is an associate professor in the International Relations Department of the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts