Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy.
This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture.
About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of Chinese.
In his novel The True Story of Ah-Q, the protagonist, Ah-Q (阿Q), is constantly bowing and kneeling before Master Zhao (趙太爺), while acting domineering toward the character of the “little nun.”
It is a reminder of how Chinese, steeped in the history of totalitarianism and social hierarchy, have cultivated this social malaise and toxic habit of “one must save face by the end of one’s life, even if one is a slave.”
Taiwan is a democracy, acknowledged and celebrated by the world. The People’s Republic of China (PRC), ruled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), is a totalitarian dictatorship similar to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea). Since late April last year, Fu and other KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers — apparently under the CCP’s direction — have been trying to expand the Legislative Yuan’s powers, stifling the Constitutional Court’s judicial independence and redirecting funds from the central government to local government coffers, while cutting away at Taiwan’s development, all the while creating antagonism and opposition between the public and state employees, such as police officers, teachers and civil servants, as well as fanning the flames of ethnic rivalry.
They are doing this to overturn the nation’s democratic and constitutional order, as well as social stability.
This kowtowing to dictators aims to turn Taiwanese into the character of the “little nun,” bullied into a toxic servile spirit.
Taiwanese can see all of this clearly.
In 2019, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) used Hong Kong police, CCP agents, Hong Kong exiles, the pro-China Legislative Council members and People’s Liberation Army units stationed in the territory to consign former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) “one country, two systems” to the dustbin of history, throttling Hong Kongers’ freedoms.
It is little wonder that top pan-blue camp figures, such as former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) and Fu — who has a majority hold on the legislature — and Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), as well as members of the TPP, would rather align themselves with China’s “one China” principle and sophistries that “both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to China,” and that “the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are one family,” and obediently follow and welcome the dictatorial CCP’s extraterritorial jurisdiction, while trying to dismantle Taiwan’s democracy and force it to become a part of China.
Taiwanese see all of this clearly.
When Ma, Chu, Han, Fu, KMT legislators Chen Yu-chen (陳玉珍), Wang Hung-wei (王鴻薇) and Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲), and independent Legislator May Chin (高金素梅) act as obedient slaves to a Chinese master, by forcing through several controversial bills in the legislature that would harm Taiwanese, assaulting Democratic Progressive Party legislators and installing steel wire on top of the walls enclosing the legislature, these bad lawmakers are acting like Lu Xun’s protagonist.
Fu and other KMT lawmakers are afraid to face a Taiwanese public that is ready to implement a mass recall against them. Chu, who is trying to oppose and recall DPP legislators in retaliation, shied away from having a showdown with the Executive Yuan.
We should concentrate on the historic abyss of China’s dictatorships and authoritarianism.
The KMT and the TPP see the CCP as a Master Zhao figure, to be exalted and worshiped, and are unwilling to engage as representatives for their legitimate masters, their democratic constituencies.
This mask of enjoying being masters in Taiwan’s democracy while still hiding their conformity to bone-deep “Chinese dictatorial tendencies” harms Taiwan’s democracy. Taiwanese must see through to this deeper level.
Chen Tsai-neng is a doctoral candidate at National Chung Hsing University’s Graduate Institute of International Politics.
Translated by Tim Smith
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS