The legislature has recently rejected all seven nominees for the Constitutional Court, including National Taiwan University professor of law Chang Wen-chin (張文貞) and Parliament Observation Culture and Education Foundation (國會觀察文教基金會) chair Yao Li-ming (姚立明) for president and vice president of the Judicial Yuan respectively.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said the party made the decision based on the belief that the death penalty should not be abolished. Therefore, all seven nominees are ineligible due to their stance on the issue.
According to a Constitutional Court ruling last year, the death sentence is prohibited for defendants who committed crimes not resulting directly and intentionally in death, as well as for “defendants with mental conditions, even if their mental conditions did not influence their offense in the cases in question.”
The Supreme Court affirmed that in its rulings on Tang Ching-hua (湯景華), who was found guilty of manslaughter in 2021, Chen Kun-ming (陳昆明), who killed two people in 2003, and Shen Wen-pin (沈文賓), who was put on death row on March 2020. The last death row inmate executed was Weng Jen-hsien (翁仁賢), who was convicted of killing six people.
The only change the Constitutional Court made is that the imposition of the death penalty should require a unanimous verdict. Even before the ruling, there had hardly been any executions or anyone sentenced to death in the past four years.
The opposition lawmakers have turned a blind eye to some pressing issues regarding amendments to the Criminal Code.
On Dec. 9 last year, a man in his 70s killed his wife who had a rare disease. It was said that he was exhausted after taking care of her for a long time. He turned himself in and was detained on a murder charge. That was the eighth time that a carer had committed murder last year.
More than half of the carers who had murdered the people they were caring for had been taking care of the victims for more than 10 years, and nearly half of them committed suicide afterwards, the Academy for the Judiciary said. Most did not have criminal records. They killed the victims mainly due to unbearable pressure and a wish to end the victims’ suffering.
The Ministry of Justice in March 2023 proposed that defendants sentenced to three years in prison, instead of two years, could get a suspension. The ministry also proposed amendments to the criteria for deferring prosecution. Another proposal was to prescribe a lower penalty for carers involved in murder cases in accordance with articles 273 and 274 of the Criminal Code.
Article 273 states that any person who kills someone due to righteous indignation would be sentenced to imprisonment of up to seven years. Article 274 states that a mother who causes the death of her child under unavoidable circumstances would be sentenced to between six months and five years.
It is regrettable that the ministry’s proposal was not followed by further actions by the government.
President William Lai (賴清德) would have to nominate new candidates. I hope the opposition would not again get entangled in meaningless disputes over the death penalty. Lawmakers should focus on the nominees’ stances on issues surrounding the criminal liability of carers involved in murder cases and active euthanasia.
Whether the nominees agree that we should decriminalize abetting suicide, referencing Germany’s criminal code, and how to alleviate the judiciary’s burden regarding the rapid increase in the number of cases, there are more pressing issues than the controversies surrounding the death penalty.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor.
Translated by Fion Khan
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences