The legislature has recently rejected all seven nominees for the Constitutional Court, including National Taiwan University professor of law Chang Wen-chin (張文貞) and Parliament Observation Culture and Education Foundation (國會觀察文教基金會) chair Yao Li-ming (姚立明) for president and vice president of the Judicial Yuan respectively.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said the party made the decision based on the belief that the death penalty should not be abolished. Therefore, all seven nominees are ineligible due to their stance on the issue.
According to a Constitutional Court ruling last year, the death sentence is prohibited for defendants who committed crimes not resulting directly and intentionally in death, as well as for “defendants with mental conditions, even if their mental conditions did not influence their offense in the cases in question.”
The Supreme Court affirmed that in its rulings on Tang Ching-hua (湯景華), who was found guilty of manslaughter in 2021, Chen Kun-ming (陳昆明), who killed two people in 2003, and Shen Wen-pin (沈文賓), who was put on death row on March 2020. The last death row inmate executed was Weng Jen-hsien (翁仁賢), who was convicted of killing six people.
The only change the Constitutional Court made is that the imposition of the death penalty should require a unanimous verdict. Even before the ruling, there had hardly been any executions or anyone sentenced to death in the past four years.
The opposition lawmakers have turned a blind eye to some pressing issues regarding amendments to the Criminal Code.
On Dec. 9 last year, a man in his 70s killed his wife who had a rare disease. It was said that he was exhausted after taking care of her for a long time. He turned himself in and was detained on a murder charge. That was the eighth time that a carer had committed murder last year.
More than half of the carers who had murdered the people they were caring for had been taking care of the victims for more than 10 years, and nearly half of them committed suicide afterwards, the Academy for the Judiciary said. Most did not have criminal records. They killed the victims mainly due to unbearable pressure and a wish to end the victims’ suffering.
The Ministry of Justice in March 2023 proposed that defendants sentenced to three years in prison, instead of two years, could get a suspension. The ministry also proposed amendments to the criteria for deferring prosecution. Another proposal was to prescribe a lower penalty for carers involved in murder cases in accordance with articles 273 and 274 of the Criminal Code.
Article 273 states that any person who kills someone due to righteous indignation would be sentenced to imprisonment of up to seven years. Article 274 states that a mother who causes the death of her child under unavoidable circumstances would be sentenced to between six months and five years.
It is regrettable that the ministry’s proposal was not followed by further actions by the government.
President William Lai (賴清德) would have to nominate new candidates. I hope the opposition would not again get entangled in meaningless disputes over the death penalty. Lawmakers should focus on the nominees’ stances on issues surrounding the criminal liability of carers involved in murder cases and active euthanasia.
Whether the nominees agree that we should decriminalize abetting suicide, referencing Germany’s criminal code, and how to alleviate the judiciary’s burden regarding the rapid increase in the number of cases, there are more pressing issues than the controversies surrounding the death penalty.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor.
Translated by Fion Khan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS