Taiwan steps into the new year set to become a “super-aged society,” with the population of those aged 65 or older surpassing 20 percent, or about 4.6 million.
Population aging has become a worldwide trend and a crucial challenge to the development of many nations. Taiwan only took seven years to go from “aged” in 2018 to “super-aged” this year, among the fastest jumps in the world.
The National Development Council has said that the 65-or-older age group would reach 30 percent of Taiwan’s population by 2039 and 50 percent in 2070 as a result of falling birthrates and longer life expectancies.
Adding to the concern is that Taiwan’s demographic bonus — in which the “productive” population (aged 15 to 65) is bigger than the “non-productive” population (all others) — is expected to end in 2028. The nation’s population is projected to fall below 23 million in 2030, with a median age of 48.7, meaning it is on the brink of a dire labor shortage, an issue that is already hindering its progress.
The old-age dependency ratio — ie, the number of elderly people being supported by working age adults — is expected to surge from 28 percent today to 51 percent by 2040 and 100 percent by 2070. The current ratio indicates that each elderly person is be supported by 3.6 working adults on average, but by 2070 one worker would be supporting at least one elderly person.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party last month pushed through a slew of legislative amendments in favor of elderly people. The moves were seen as an effort to solidify the parties’ standing among elderly people, but they would worsen generational inequity and add to the burden of the working population, even as their earning power decreases.
An amendment to the Senior Citizen Welfare Act (老人福利法) to exempt some elderly people from having to pay National Health Insurance (NHI) premiums would cut about NT$54 billion (US$1.64 billion) from the NHI systems revenue per year, bleeding off its safety reserve and bringing forward possible bankruptcy to as early as next year. If that happens, the working age population would be required to pay more.
Medical associations called the amendment “unfair,” as the growth in medical expenditure for elderly people far exceeds that for the rest of the population, which nevertheless fund up to 70 percent of the NHI budget.
The change would wreck the NHI system, putting everyone’s healthcare at risk.
An amendment to the Employment Service Act (就業服務法) would allow people aged 80 or older to bypass Barthel Index-based health evaluations to hire caregivers. This also triggered concern that elderly people might benefit at the expense of the working age population.
The number of people aged 80 or older is 910,000, with more than 60 percent of them not in need of professional care, medical data showed. The amendment to ease requirements for hiring caregivers would prompt a significant rise in demand and deepen a shortage of migrant caregivers. That would affect elderly people with moderate to severe disabilities, who need such services the most, and would add to the financial burden on disadvantaged and young working families with disabled members who have to compete for caregiving services.
Taiwan needs to make resource-allocation and policymaking adjustments to meet the challenge of demographic aging, but it must also beware of intensifying social and generational inequity.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
RSS