The present POLITICAL chaos in Taiwan stems from the Legislative Yuan, as it does not accurately reflect the will of the majority. Rather, Taiwanese find themselves in a doomsday scenario where a minority of legislators are bullying the majority of citizens. However, why does the legislature not accurately reflect majority public opinion?
First, the legislative election contravened the fundamental human right of equal voting power. Compared with other legislators, how many votes did independent Legislator May Chin (高金素梅) have? What about Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍)? The value of votes is clearly not equal, yet voting rights are treated as equal. That practice is incorrect, as it contravenes the fundamental human rights of the majority. It must be corrected — otherwise, it would be impossible for the results of votes in the Legislative Yuan to truly reflect public opinion.
Second, there should be a way to get rid of at-large legislators. In democratic countries, rights come from the people — there should not exist a position where an elected official is free to do as they please, entirely exempt from recall or removal once they take office. That contravenes foundational democratic principles. Taiwan is not a monarchy. All representatives must be subject to reasonable limitations and adhere to recall motions and exit mechanisms — otherwise, there would be no remedy when an at-large legislator deviates from public opinion and is unsuited to represent the people.
Last, there must be reasonable regulations set for legislators. Those convicted of indecency, gang activity, financial crimes or fraud are not suited to serve as legislators. Such people are the lowest in society — so how is it that the lowest of the low can represent the opinions of honest citizens? That is not normal in a democracy.
Today, the Legislative Yuan does not regulate criminals in the legislature, lacks an exit mechanism for at-large legislators and possesses an electoral system that contravenes the principle of equal voting power. As a result, it is full of gangsters, fraudsters and financial criminals — puppets of the Chinese Communist Party. It is only natural that the Legislative Yuan does not reflect the will of the public. How could such a political scene be anything but chaotic?
Mike Chang is an accountant.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS