The present POLITICAL chaos in Taiwan stems from the Legislative Yuan, as it does not accurately reflect the will of the majority. Rather, Taiwanese find themselves in a doomsday scenario where a minority of legislators are bullying the majority of citizens. However, why does the legislature not accurately reflect majority public opinion?
First, the legislative election contravened the fundamental human right of equal voting power. Compared with other legislators, how many votes did independent Legislator May Chin (高金素梅) have? What about Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍)? The value of votes is clearly not equal, yet voting rights are treated as equal. That practice is incorrect, as it contravenes the fundamental human rights of the majority. It must be corrected — otherwise, it would be impossible for the results of votes in the Legislative Yuan to truly reflect public opinion.
Second, there should be a way to get rid of at-large legislators. In democratic countries, rights come from the people — there should not exist a position where an elected official is free to do as they please, entirely exempt from recall or removal once they take office. That contravenes foundational democratic principles. Taiwan is not a monarchy. All representatives must be subject to reasonable limitations and adhere to recall motions and exit mechanisms — otherwise, there would be no remedy when an at-large legislator deviates from public opinion and is unsuited to represent the people.
Last, there must be reasonable regulations set for legislators. Those convicted of indecency, gang activity, financial crimes or fraud are not suited to serve as legislators. Such people are the lowest in society — so how is it that the lowest of the low can represent the opinions of honest citizens? That is not normal in a democracy.
Today, the Legislative Yuan does not regulate criminals in the legislature, lacks an exit mechanism for at-large legislators and possesses an electoral system that contravenes the principle of equal voting power. As a result, it is full of gangsters, fraudsters and financial criminals — puppets of the Chinese Communist Party. It is only natural that the Legislative Yuan does not reflect the will of the public. How could such a political scene be anything but chaotic?
Mike Chang is an accountant.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
RSS