The present POLITICAL chaos in Taiwan stems from the Legislative Yuan, as it does not accurately reflect the will of the majority. Rather, Taiwanese find themselves in a doomsday scenario where a minority of legislators are bullying the majority of citizens. However, why does the legislature not accurately reflect majority public opinion?
First, the legislative election contravened the fundamental human right of equal voting power. Compared with other legislators, how many votes did independent Legislator May Chin (高金素梅) have? What about Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍)? The value of votes is clearly not equal, yet voting rights are treated as equal. That practice is incorrect, as it contravenes the fundamental human rights of the majority. It must be corrected — otherwise, it would be impossible for the results of votes in the Legislative Yuan to truly reflect public opinion.
Second, there should be a way to get rid of at-large legislators. In democratic countries, rights come from the people — there should not exist a position where an elected official is free to do as they please, entirely exempt from recall or removal once they take office. That contravenes foundational democratic principles. Taiwan is not a monarchy. All representatives must be subject to reasonable limitations and adhere to recall motions and exit mechanisms — otherwise, there would be no remedy when an at-large legislator deviates from public opinion and is unsuited to represent the people.
Last, there must be reasonable regulations set for legislators. Those convicted of indecency, gang activity, financial crimes or fraud are not suited to serve as legislators. Such people are the lowest in society — so how is it that the lowest of the low can represent the opinions of honest citizens? That is not normal in a democracy.
Today, the Legislative Yuan does not regulate criminals in the legislature, lacks an exit mechanism for at-large legislators and possesses an electoral system that contravenes the principle of equal voting power. As a result, it is full of gangsters, fraudsters and financial criminals — puppets of the Chinese Communist Party. It is only natural that the Legislative Yuan does not reflect the will of the public. How could such a political scene be anything but chaotic?
Mike Chang is an accountant.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS