Those who follow the energy transition seem perpetually pitched between elation and despair. For every fragment of positive news — surging Chinese electric vehicle (EV) sales; record-low prices for solar panels and batteries — there is a dollop of misery, be it a botched climate conference or still-resilient investment in oil and gas.
And yet some of the most important climate developments this year have barely made the headlines. We looked at three negative overlooked stories yesterday. Here are three positive trends you might have missed that might play out in more visible ways next year.
The sun also rises
The past year has been a brutal one for the Chinese companies that dominate the solar industry. A rush to build new production lines has sent capacity well ahead of demand, forcing down prices and driving almost every player deep into the red. The six companies that dominate the sector would lose about 15 billion yuan (US$2.1 billion) this year, based on the median of analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg.
However, things look a lot better next year: Bruised by the experience of this year, big players are cutting capital spending while small and medium-sized manufacturers are going out of business, tightening the market. A notoriously cyclical industry appears to be nearing another turning point: Bloomberg Intelligence reckons revenues would rise 25 percent next year and analysts expect the big six’s net income to hit 11 billion yuan over the full year.
Europe shifts gears
Sales of electric cars in Europe have been dismal this year, with third-quarter volumes down 9 percent from 12 months earlier. That has led to fears that the region could follow the US in watching its transition to electric vehicles stall, leaving it far behind China, where half of new car sales now come with a plug. Do not be so sure about that: From next year, fleet sales in the EU must be on average 15 percent more efficient than they were in 2021, a target that manufacturers are aiming to hit by whetting consumers’ appetites with a range of exciting new battery models.
Several new iconic designs are set to go on sale next year, from EV versions of the Range Rover, Porsche Boxster and Audi RS, to the Volkswagen AG ID2all — an electric Golf, in all but name — and the Ford Capri EV, which shares a name, but not much else with the original gas-powered coupe. There is also a dirt-cheap city car coming on the market from Renault SA’s Dacia marque, plus a host of Chinese imports that are likely to make their way past the EU’s new tariff barriers.
BloombergNEF expects 3.2 million plug-in cars to sell in Europe this year, up just 2 percent from last year. There is a good chance that accelerates dramatically next year and ends up north of 4 million vehicles.
Charging up the grid
You do not need to buy any fuel to power a wind or solar farm, so it is paradoxical that recent years have had some of the highest wholesale power prices in history. That is because of a quirk of how electricity markets usually work: via minute-by-minute auctions where the price for everyone is set by the most costly generator that is needed to meet grid demand. Historically, that has always been a gas turbine and spiraling prices for methane since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 have meant daily peaks have often hit levels north of US$10 per kilowatt-hour.
It is an old adage of commodities that the cure for high prices is high prices and that is playing out right now. Lithium-ion batteries can increasingly provide peak power at costs that undercut gas and there has been a rash of new installations as capitalists make efforts to arbitrage the price opportunity. The Texas and California grids each have about 11 gigawatts of batteries connected, sufficient to power Hungary for 12 months. That already seems to be keeping maximum costs lower than in previous years. As batteries get cheaper still, the grid volatility that has caused such angst in recent years might subside.
We made a similar list of overlooked stories last year. For the sake of honesty, let us see how those predictions held up.
Coal consumption has peaked: When Russia invaded Ukraine and Beijing ordered its miners to dig up more solid fuel, there was a rash of headlines about a supposed “return to coal.” We said that last year might instead prove the peak for global coal demand. That is looking less likely now. The International Energy Agency reckons consumption rose again this year and would plateau from last year out to 2027. November’s trade, output and inventory data in China, the biggest consumer, suggests consumption this year was only about 6.5 million metric tonnes, or 0.1 percent, higher than last year. However, there is little prospect of the precipitous drop that is needed.
The wind rises: A spate of bad news for wind power toward the end of last year led to feverish claims that something was wrong with the entire business model. That does not look to be the case, although developing markets such as China, Latin America and central Asia seem to be performing better than Europe and the US.
In global terms, installations would hit a record 124 gigawatts this year, BloombergNEF said. They have upgraded their forecast for new 2024-2030 capacity by a cumulative 151GW, 16 percent higher than 12 months earlier.
EVs are hitting price parity: It is hard to credit it these days, but the big fear for EVs last year was that soaring raw materials prices would prevent them competing on price with gasoline for years to come, if ever. In fact, the big story of this year was that falling lithium-ion prices had made Chinese electric cars so cheap that the US and EU raised eye-watering tariff barriers to protect themselves. Parity is well and truly here: Average battery EV prices are now below US$100 per kilowatt-hour, an oft-cited tipping point for that measure.
Averting catastrophic climate change was always going to involve plenty of steps forward as well as steps back. Still, there are plenty of positive trends out there, once you peer past the more alarmist headlines. However gloomy things might look right now, the transition to a cleaner global economy is not flagging yet.
David Fickling is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change and energy. Previously, he worked for Bloomberg News, the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times.
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
RSS