Wars are remembered by their iconic images and finding a triumphal photograph has been a key goal for belligerents striving to leave their mark on history. On Dec. 8, after fighting ceaselessly for 14 months, Israel finally got its image of victory. It shows three soldiers in full combat gear posing with Israel’s Star of David-and-stripes flag on a mountaintop against the cloudy sky. The
Israel Defense Forces’ (IDF) special forces captured the highest peak of Mount Hermon in Syria, overlooking Damascus and the Golan Heights, the caption explained.
Mere hours after the flight of Syria’s deposed despot, Bashar al-Assad, Israel launched a quick attack to capture the formerly demilitarized zone across the disengagement line that has marked the de facto Israel-Syrian border since 1974, pushing its conquest up to the Hermon peak. The land grab, which met no resistance, was coupled with a massive bombing campaign to destroy the dangerous assets left behind by the ousted regime’s military: jet fighters and helicopters, warships, missile factories and storage facilities, air defense systems, and research and development laboratories. All were targeted lest they fall into enemy hands.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who never misses a publicity stunt, flew to the border on Dec. 8 to declare the “collapse” of the 1974 disengagement agreement, blaming the defecting Syrian soldiers abandoning their positions. The next morning he was scheduled to take the stand in his ongoing corruption trial.
Now he could sugarcoat the courtroom appearance with his typical bravado:
“I said we would change the Middle East and we are indeed doing so. Syria is not the same Syria. Lebanon is not the same Lebanon. Gaza is not the same Gaza. And the head of the axis, Iran, is not the same Iran,” he declared in a statement.
His arch-nemesis, Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, supported Netanyahu’s claims, blaming the US, “the Zionist regime” and “a neighboring country” [Turkey] for the toppling of al-Assad, the Islamic Republic’s erstwhile ally.
Then on Tuesday last week, a body armor-clad Netanyahu concluded his triumph by visiting the newly occupied peak (and exacting a day off from court), pledging from the mount to hold the territory “until a new arrangement, determined by Israel, could be found,” or in other words for ever.
The symbolic subtext could not be missed: Netanyahu is the last man standing. Shrugging off his responsibility for Israel’s worst-ever calamity, the Hamas attack of Oct. 7 last year, maneuvering his political enemies at home and adversaries abroad, and presiding over the successful military counteroffensive against Hamas in Gaza and, most significantly, against Hezbollah in Lebanon, the prime minister has proved himself to be the master of job survival.
However, the peak performance was not celebrated only by diehard Bibists. The New York Times’ top Middle East watcher, Thomas Friedman, hardly a Netanyahu cheerleader, equated the recent Israeli achievements against Iran and its proxies to its 1967 blitzkrieg victory. Retired general Amos Yadlin, a former pilot and military intelligence chief, coauthored a Foreign Affairs article titled “An Israeli order in the Middle East.” Both have captured the uplifted mood of victory among the country’s Jewish majority. This feeling has permeated Israeli society since the assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in September, followed by the group conceding defeat by accepting a ceasefire and ditching the battered Palestinians in Gaza. The ensuing fall of al-Assad, and footage of newly acquired territory and charred Syrian aircraft has only lifted the national morale higher.
Syria has always held a special place in Israel’s national mythology as an unrelenting rival, from the 1948 war of independence through endless wars and skirmishes over the years (although for a while it was a coveted peace partner). Al-Assad’s father, Hafez al-Assad, sought “strategic parity” with Israel’s nuclear deterrent by acquiring chemical weapons; his son upped the ante and secretly built a nuclear reactor with North Korean help, which was disclosed and destroyed by Israel in 2007. Both negotiated a land-for-peace deal over the Golan Heights that never matured. When Syria imploded under the Arab spring rebellion, Israel launched an airstrike campaign against Iran’s military buildup there, but the Golan border was kept quiet and stable — even after then-US president Donald Trump recognized Israel’s annexation of the territory in 2019.
Now Trump is coming back with a vengeance — and so disregarding international law, and its opposition to acquiring territory by force, could not be easier for Israel.
Netanyahu described the Syrian upheaval as the most important development in the region “since the Sykes-Picot agreement” of 1916 between colonialist Britain and France, which designated spheres of influence in the event of the Ottoman empire being partitioned, thereby hinting at a new era of redrawing of borders.
The Israeli punditry is accordingly excited over the new possibilities opened in Syria: carving up its territory, moving the border eastward, sponsoring its Druze and Kurdish minorities as Israeli proxies.
Meanwhile, the IDF is keeping a low profile in its new positions in Syria, liaising with local villagers and confiscating arms while its soldiers are grabbing photos of the al-Assads from deserted Syrian positions as booty souvenirs.
At the height of Syria’s civil war in the previous decade, Israel backed rebels who are now part of the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham alliance that kicked out Bashar al-Assad and took charge in Damascus. Its leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa (AKA, Abu Mohammed al-Julani), has raised only mild protest against the Israeli offensive in Syria, but the right-wingers in Jerusalem would not forgive him for his association with al-Qaeda.
Israeli Minister of Defense Israel Katz told a Knesset committee that “we need to prevent a murderous regime with Nazi ideology from growing on our doorstep. [Bashar al-]Assad, al-Julani, [Turkish President Recep Tayyip] Erdogan — it’s all the same thing.”
In other words, Netanyahu and his political allies are sensing an opportunity to promote their “greater Israel” ideology and will not climb down from the Hermon peak.
Alas, images of victory never tell the entire story. As US theorist Susan Sontag wrote in her farewell book, Regarding the Pain of Others: “To photograph is to frame, and to frame is to exclude.”
The magic of the Israeli copycat of the photograph taken on Iwo Jima by US Marines in the final stages of World War II lies in its sterility. There was no fighting on the Syrian front, hence no IDF casualties. Nor was there mass death, devastation and starvation on the other side, as in Gaza, where Israel retaliated fiercely for the massacre of its citizens and service people last year. Faced with pictures and testimonies from Gaza, Israelis tend to look the other way. They prefer the beautiful skies over the slopes, filling their lungs once again with the long-lost air of superiority and self-righteousness.
Aluf Benn is the editor-in-chief of Haaretz.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military
RSS