Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲) said that while taking a taxi on a visit to Hualien County, the driver began to curse the Democratic Progressive Party’s cross-strait policy, saying it caused Chinese tourists to stop visiting Taiwan, hurting his business. He also said that civil servants used to visit Hualien and Taitung counties for the hot springs, but that they have stopped coming since the implementation of pension reforms.
Wu shared this anecdote to exaggerate the situation, with the aim of creating social panic to benefit specific political parties or individuals.
Pension reform has caused social conflict and civil unrest, but after much difficulty, the government has finally established a fairer system. Yet, some people want to stir up trouble in hopes of overturning the reforms.
The original pension system for the military, civil servants and teachers was indeed too high. Even with annual reductions, it is still much more favorable compared with other pensions — especially those for laborers.
To claim that these reductions make it impossible for pensioners to travel the world is hard to believe, let alone to say that they are financially unable to travel to Hualien or Taitung.
Pension reform should be approached holistically. With its limited resources, the government is tasked with looking after the entire public. The military, civil servants and teachers already claim disproportionate access to those resources, which in turn reduces the support available to other social groups.
Even if the nation’s financial resources improve, they should be used to expand overall support rather than be redirected back to specific groups. That would avoid a tilt in national development, which could give rise to social division.
It is alright for legislators to speak up for specific social groups, but deliberately exaggerating individual cases only illustrates a pattern of intolerance. A rising tide lifts all boats, but if legislators only focus on the interests of certain groups, national development as a whole would fall to pieces. When that happens, the military, civil servants and teachers would also become victims. Is that the outcome KMT legislators want?
Li Kuan-long is a university lecturer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS