On Monday, Warren Buffett announced that he was donating more than US$1 billion in Berkshire Hathaway Inc shares to four family foundations — a continuation of his commitment to give away most of his wealth to charity rather than pass it on to his family.
With the announcement, Buffett put out a memo that was less about the nuts and bolts of the donation than the importance of getting your affairs in order at the end of your life. Close readers of Buffett know that this is his modus operandi. Below the surface, his musings are often steeped with advice about leadership and management.
However, at 94, Buffett is clearly thinking about his mortality and acknowledges that “father time always wins.”
More than ever, he seems determined to pass on not just lessons about what makes a good investment but what makes a good life.
Here are my takeaways:
Do not create dynasties (or nepo babies). Buffett mentions more than once in his memo that he does not believe in dynastic wealth.
“Parents should leave their children enough so they can do anything but not enough that they can do nothing,” he wrote.
Two out of his three kids are on Berkshire’s board, but none are in management — nor would any of them ever become chief executive officer (CEO).
Contrast this with the nepo baby moment in other parts of the business world as a generational shift in power takes place at family-run companies. For those not fluent in Internet-speak, a nepo baby is someone whose career benefits from the wealth or connections of successful parents. The result often is infighting, a la Estee Lauder Inc, or a tendency to put the wrong person in charge — for example: Tyson Foods Inc. Tasking your children to give away massive sums of a family’s wealth rather than accumulating more of it seems like a healthier way to live.
Acknowledge your good fortune. Buffett leans toward self-effacement, and more often credits his success with his good luck than he does with his genius. He wrote that his lucky streak “began in 1930 with my birth in the United States as a white male,” adding that, “so favored by my male status, very early on I had confidence that I would become rich.”
This mentality — that his lot in life has had an outsized-impact on his prosperity — is what has motivated him to pass along his wealth “to others who were given a very short straw at birth.”
It likely has also prevented a lot of hubris and the kind of unforced errors that can come with it.
Be transparent about your plans. Buffett says that every parent should have their children read their will, explain why they made certain decisions and adopt their feedback when it makes sense.
“I saw many families driven apart after the posthumous dictates of the will left beneficiaries confused and sometimes angry,” he wrote. “I also witnessed a few cases where a wealthy parent’s will that was fully discussed before death helped the family become closer.”
Buffett has taken the same approach to succession planning at Berkshire, where his transparency has prevented a lot of drama. As I have written before, a CEO handoff should be without mystery and as boring as possible. The same goes for a will.
Live below your means. Buffett has long extolled the magic of compounding, describing it as akin to a snowball rolling downhill picking up speed and mass. In his memo, he wrote that the real payoff comes in the final 20 years of life. The famously frugal Buffett — he lives in the same house in Omaha he bought in 1958 — has amassed a huge amount of savings, or as he dubs it, “units of deferred consumption.” That has allowed the snowball to grow even bigger, accumulating more money for him to give away.
Tell your kids you are proud of them. That is what Buffett does at the end of his letter. No notes.
Beth Kowitt is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering corporate America. She was previously a senior writer and editor at Fortune. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS