Software testers hired by Australia’s government to determine how to enforce the world’s first national teen social media ban have worked on defence and election contracts, but they would use another experience to guide their study: Wrangling their own children online.
“We’re all parents of kids of various ages and we’re definitely aware of all the little tricks kids do,” said Andrew Hammond, general manager at tech contractor KJR, which would conduct the trial of about 1,200 randomly chosen Australians from January to March.
“Kids are quite resourceful, so we’ll definitely have our eyes and ears open,” added Hammond, whose company’s previous projects included checking deployment software for Australian troops in Afghanistan.
Illustration: Tania Chou
The study, one of the biggest-ever trials of age-checking technology, would likely set the course for lawmakers and tech platforms around the world as they navigate a push to age-restrict social media at a time of growing concern about youth mental health and data collection.
From late next year, platforms including Meta’s Instagram, Elon Musk’s X, TikTok and Snapchat must show Australians they are taking reasonable steps to keep out users under 16 or face fines up to A$49.5 million (US$32.2 million). Google’s YouTube, a classroom staple, is exempt.
However, the legislation does not specify what those reasonable steps must be. That is down to the trial, overseen by the Age Check Certification Scheme, a British consulting firm, which expects about 12 participating tech firms and must give recommendations by the middle of next year.
Options include age estimation, where a user’s video selfie is biometrically analysed then deleted; age verification, where a user uploads identifying documents to a third-party provider, which sends an anonymous confirmation “token” to the platform; and age inference, where a user’s email address is cross-checked with other accounts.
“The approach the Australian government takes could influence how other countries approach online age checks for social media content,” said Julie Dawson, chief policy and regulatory officer at age-verification company Yoti, which does age checks for Meta’s new system of heightened privacy settings for teenage Instagram users.
Some European countries and US states have legislated age minimums for social media, but none has rolled out an enforcement regime due to legal challenges based on preserving privacy and free speech.
Even lawmakers in Australia’s conservative opposition, whose support was needed to get the centre-left government’s ban through parliament, warned the ban could be used to justify collecting personal information — an echo of a post this month from X owner Musk that it “seems like a backdoor way to control access to the Internet by all Australians.”
Australian Communications Minister Michelle Rowlands told the Australian parliament the ban was “not about government mandating any form of technology or demanding any personal information handed over to social media companies.”
A last-minute change to the law stipulates that platforms asking for identifying documents must offer an alternative age-verification method.
Pressure to block minors from parts of the Internet has been around since pornography and gambling Web sites overran the early World Wide Web. It has taken on a new urgency since a Meta whistleblower leaked internal e-mails in 2021 purportedly showing knowledge that its products were harmful to young users. Meta has said the documents were misinterpreted.
Rising demand has spurred technological development, but no product is fool-proof yet in combining accuracy, privacy, security and user-friendliness, said Tony Allen, CEO of the Age Check Certification Scheme, which would test products for Australia on those criteria.
Adding to the challenge, many people in the age range targeted by bans do not have common identifying documents, such as a driver’s licence or credit card.
That helps the case for age-checking technology involving analysis of a person’s features, such as facial wrinkles or their hands.
Yoti said its accuracy has improved to the point where it can pick more than 99 percent of people aged 13-17 as under 25. It says its standard deviation of error in guessing the age of an 18-year-old is just over one year.
That may not yet be accurate enough for an age restriction in a country of 27 million people, said Konstantin Poptodorov, director of fraud and identity for digital identification company LexisNexis Risk Solutions, who noted the rapid improvements and uptake of technologies such as facial recognition in the past decade.
Meta’s policy director for Australia and New Zealand, Mia Garlick, said Yoti has been beneficial to enforcing Instagram’s teen privacy policy, but added that appearance-wise “some people grow up really quickly, and some people don’t.”
Meta did not know if expanding its Yoti arrangement would satisfy the Australian ban, because “we don’t know if what we do currently is going to be considered ‘reasonable steps’,” she added.
Providers that rely on uploaded identification documents might participate in the trial, but “almost the whole ethos behind the way age assurance works is ‘we don’t want to collect any data’,” said Allen.
Software testers would ask some trial participants to try and fool the technology with appearance-adjusting filters, but would weed out only the products that failed to stop workarounds and were deemed cheap and scalable, he said.
Allen had no front-runner for what product he would recommend, but he did predict one recommendation: “There should be choice for consumers.”
“They should all be as effective and meet a certain level of assurance, but if you’re looking for a silver bullet you won’t find it,” he added.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS