Four days after President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech reiterating that “the Republic of China [ROC] and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other,” China on Monday held a “Joint Sword-2024B” military drill that surrounded Taiwan, claiming it was “a stern warning to the separatist acts of Taiwan independence forces.”
While it was widely expected and predicted that China would have a strong reaction to display its displeasure regardless of what Lai said in his speech, its drill has seen an international audience focus on Lai’s speech, and also lit a backfire on China’s ambitions on cross-strait “unification” and regional domination.
In the speech, Lai mentioned the historical fact that “the ROC was established 113 years ago by a group of people who rose and overthrew an imperial regime, hoping to establish a free, democratic nation of equality and benevolence,” following his previous “motherland” comment in a ceremony ahead of the speech to highlight the truth that the 75-year-old PRC cannot be the “motherland” of the democratic ROC.
Although the ROC government retreated to Taiwan in 1949 after the forces of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) were defeated by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), Lai in the speech reminded Taiwanese not to forget “the Battle of Guningtou 75 years ago” and “the Aug. 23 Artillery Battle 66 years ago,” in which the ROC had defeated the PLA’s attempts to invade Taiwan.
Those battles clearly highlight that the PLA never managed to gain control of Taiwan during the Chinese Civil War and that the PRC has never controlled or ruled Taiwan for even a day.
“China has no right to represent Taiwan,” Lai said.
Lai’s speech has been widely considered to be restrained, repeating well-known facts and stances on Taiwan’s position, and extending goodwill by offering dialogue with China.
It took five days for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office to release a statement proclaiming Lai’s speech to be another “two country” assertion, but failing to deny the historical facts highlighted by Lai.
Since then-US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi visited Taiwan in 2022, China has conducted at least four large military exercises surrounding Taiwan. A report released by the Taiwanese Opinions Foundation showed a trend of more Taiwanese objecting to cross-strait unification, which this year reached a new high of more than 90 percent of Taiwanese feeling loathing or apathy toward China, and 77 percent against unification, 23 points higher than a survey in 2016.
China’s drill has been seen as a show of its military muscle that aims to deter possible international aid to Taiwan in a military conflict, but it has caused more support for Taiwan from more than 40 like-minded nations, according to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The US Department of State said that “China’s response with military provocations to a routine speech is unwarranted,” while democracies such as Japan, France and UK all emphasized the importance of peace in the Taiwan Strait and opposed “unilateral actions that change the status quo.”
In the past year, the warships of 10 nations have transited the Taiwan Strait, including the first German ships in two decades and the unprecedented passage of a Japan Self-Defense Forces naval destroyer.
In additional to the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue and AUKUS, a growing number of other military collaborations among like-minded democracies in the Asia-Pacific region, such as the Japan-Philippines Reciprocal Access Agreement, have also arisen, aiming to contain China’s provocative military expansionism.
China should learn that its military oppression is fueling the rise of more opposition in the international community.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
RSS