The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region.
This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea.
The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led process to a Chinese-dominated process.
Most ASEAN members demurred from speaking up against China’s aggressive intentions in the region, which led to the emergence of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue among the US, India, Japan and Australia.
This year, there have been nuanced changes at ASEAN.
China has faced more criticism and protests over its actions than before. Although Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) did not attend the East Asia Summit, instead sending Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強), he must have heard the concerns expressed by ASEAN and its partners. When the ASEAN Plus One meetings began, the China meeting on Thursday was among the earliest.
The ASEAN-China joint statement after that meeting expressed bonhomie and an intention to expand their comprehensive strategic partnership.
However, there are reports that the Philippines, Vietnam and Singapore as well as the new prime minister of Thailand expressed concern at Chinese activities in the South China Sea and the slow progress on a code of conduct for the region.
Li said that ASEAN-China relations have grown to have far-reaching impact in Asia and globally. He pledged to work with ASEAN to create a better future for Asia in the spirit of friendship, mutual benefit and inclusiveness, and to work with other countries in the region to build a better Asian community.
China blames US intervention in the region for the negative views expressed against Beijing.
However, this is suspect.
The Philippines, which has suffered the brunt of Chinese intervention in its exclusive economic zone and its outlying shoals, was apparently most vocal in asking China to abide by good principles. Other ASEAN members such as Vietnam that had been silent in recent years also spoke up. This possibly stems from a recent Chinese effort to curb Vietnamese fishing in disputed regions.
It was apparently the first time that maritime issues related to the South China Sea were raised by ASEAN members at the ASEAN-China meeting. Normally these are relegated to bilateral documents.
The code of conduct is now 20 years in the making and seems nowhere near completion.
If anything, Chinese obduracy on pursuing a code on its own terms has opened cleavages within ASEAN, with members needing to coordinate among themselves better. Those that face the direct brunt of Chinese intent are now speaking up more boldly, but get submerged in the economic agenda of ASEAN. Their voices are loud in discussions, but the volume is not reflected in ASEAN statements.
This is partly because the Quad countries have individually backed Manila and Hanoi with diplomatic and other support.
The “ASEAN Leaders’ Declaration on the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific for the Future-ready ASEAN and ASEAN-centered Regional Architecture” clearly asks all partners to respect ASEAN centrality and its norms, and contribute to the development of maritime security. This includes adherence to international law and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
India spoke more openly about keeping the South China Sea free and open and emphasizing UNCLOS, which ASEAN prefers. However, China wants to avoid it while negotiating a code of conduct.
India’s position on the South China Sea and UNCLOS has been clear, but this year’s ASEAN-India statement also referenced the rules of the International Civil Aviation Organization and the International Maritime Organization so that the free and open Indo-Pacific concept would not only cover the sea, but also the air, with the rules of the international bodies to be implemented so that China would not have the liberty to set up its own rules or interpret rules as it sees fit.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi told the ASEAN-India meeting that this is the Asian century, for which India and ASEAN were best suited. This made it clear his belief that this is not a Chinese century alone, as Beijing would like ASEAN to believe.
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who was getting acquainted with many of the regional leaders after taking office at the start of this month, also met with Li. He was more muted than he was when he publicly called for the establishment of an “Asian NATO,” as well as when commenting that Chinese intrusions into Japanese waters and airspace were unacceptable. He was nevertheless clear that Japan opposes the continuing and intensifying activities that infringe upon its sovereignty in the East China Sea.
Most countries in the region want to engage China economically and functionally, rather than exclude it. However, Beijing’s efforts to treat the South China Sea as its private lake and do as it wishes, and then expand this horizon into other parts of the Indo-Pacific region, is starting to generate reactions.
Gurjit Singh is a former Indian ambassador to Germany, Indonesia, ASEAN, Ethiopia and the African Union.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS