The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region.
This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea.
The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led process to a Chinese-dominated process.
Most ASEAN members demurred from speaking up against China’s aggressive intentions in the region, which led to the emergence of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue among the US, India, Japan and Australia.
This year, there have been nuanced changes at ASEAN.
China has faced more criticism and protests over its actions than before. Although Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) did not attend the East Asia Summit, instead sending Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強), he must have heard the concerns expressed by ASEAN and its partners. When the ASEAN Plus One meetings began, the China meeting on Thursday was among the earliest.
The ASEAN-China joint statement after that meeting expressed bonhomie and an intention to expand their comprehensive strategic partnership.
However, there are reports that the Philippines, Vietnam and Singapore as well as the new prime minister of Thailand expressed concern at Chinese activities in the South China Sea and the slow progress on a code of conduct for the region.
Li said that ASEAN-China relations have grown to have far-reaching impact in Asia and globally. He pledged to work with ASEAN to create a better future for Asia in the spirit of friendship, mutual benefit and inclusiveness, and to work with other countries in the region to build a better Asian community.
China blames US intervention in the region for the negative views expressed against Beijing.
However, this is suspect.
The Philippines, which has suffered the brunt of Chinese intervention in its exclusive economic zone and its outlying shoals, was apparently most vocal in asking China to abide by good principles. Other ASEAN members such as Vietnam that had been silent in recent years also spoke up. This possibly stems from a recent Chinese effort to curb Vietnamese fishing in disputed regions.
It was apparently the first time that maritime issues related to the South China Sea were raised by ASEAN members at the ASEAN-China meeting. Normally these are relegated to bilateral documents.
The code of conduct is now 20 years in the making and seems nowhere near completion.
If anything, Chinese obduracy on pursuing a code on its own terms has opened cleavages within ASEAN, with members needing to coordinate among themselves better. Those that face the direct brunt of Chinese intent are now speaking up more boldly, but get submerged in the economic agenda of ASEAN. Their voices are loud in discussions, but the volume is not reflected in ASEAN statements.
This is partly because the Quad countries have individually backed Manila and Hanoi with diplomatic and other support.
The “ASEAN Leaders’ Declaration on the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific for the Future-ready ASEAN and ASEAN-centered Regional Architecture” clearly asks all partners to respect ASEAN centrality and its norms, and contribute to the development of maritime security. This includes adherence to international law and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
India spoke more openly about keeping the South China Sea free and open and emphasizing UNCLOS, which ASEAN prefers. However, China wants to avoid it while negotiating a code of conduct.
India’s position on the South China Sea and UNCLOS has been clear, but this year’s ASEAN-India statement also referenced the rules of the International Civil Aviation Organization and the International Maritime Organization so that the free and open Indo-Pacific concept would not only cover the sea, but also the air, with the rules of the international bodies to be implemented so that China would not have the liberty to set up its own rules or interpret rules as it sees fit.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi told the ASEAN-India meeting that this is the Asian century, for which India and ASEAN were best suited. This made it clear his belief that this is not a Chinese century alone, as Beijing would like ASEAN to believe.
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who was getting acquainted with many of the regional leaders after taking office at the start of this month, also met with Li. He was more muted than he was when he publicly called for the establishment of an “Asian NATO,” as well as when commenting that Chinese intrusions into Japanese waters and airspace were unacceptable. He was nevertheless clear that Japan opposes the continuing and intensifying activities that infringe upon its sovereignty in the East China Sea.
Most countries in the region want to engage China economically and functionally, rather than exclude it. However, Beijing’s efforts to treat the South China Sea as its private lake and do as it wishes, and then expand this horizon into other parts of the Indo-Pacific region, is starting to generate reactions.
Gurjit Singh is a former Indian ambassador to Germany, Indonesia, ASEAN, Ethiopia and the African Union.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS