Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific.
Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences.
In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US due to several factors complicating intelligence gathering and counterespionage.
One major hurdle is China’s rapid advancement in surveillance technology, particularly in artificial intelligence-driven facial recognition and cybersecurity. China’s surveillance state, combined with big data analytics and millions of cameras, makes recruiting Chinese operatives and conducting espionage extremely risky.
US spies are now more likely to be tracked, even in third countries, when attempting to recruit Chinese officials or businessmen. Additionally, China’s robust digital surveillance infrastructure, including its “Great Firewall,” enables close monitoring of communications, further complicating covert operations.
Despite the US intelligence community’s increased focus on countering China, the challenges are growing due to the expanding scope of Chinese espionage.
While Chinese spying once primarily targeted military and defense assets, the US-China rivalry has now expanded to critical fields such as quantum computing, nuclear fusion and rare earth minerals.
China’s strategy involves embedding spy equipment in hardware and using Trojan horses in software, creating vulnerabilities in everyday devices with hackable chips and Wi-Fi capabilities.
On the digital front, China’s shift toward cyberattacks and intellectual property theft has allowed them to bypass traditional espionage methods, successfully hacking US government databases and private companies.
As China’s cyber capabilities grow, protecting US assets becomes increasingly difficult.
At the same time, many US apps and technologies, such as Google, Facebook and X, are outright banned in China, while others, such as Microsoft services, face heavy restrictions or shadow bans.
For example, Microsoft Windows is still in use, but the Chinese government has developed its own operating systems, such as Kylin and UOS, to cut down reliance on foreign software. The contrast is clear: While China embeds Trojan horses in its tech to spy on the US, the US is severely hamstrung by Chinese bans and restrictions, making it nearly impossible to conduct the same level of espionage within China.
China’s legal framework has shifted dramatically, granting state security agencies sweeping powers under new counterespionage laws to investigate and detain people suspected of working with foreign intelligence services.
These changes have significantly increased risks for US operatives and local contacts gathering intelligence.
Diplomatic tensions between the US and China have also reduced opportunities for intelligence collection.
Furthermore, the US has become increasingly suspicious of Chinese expatriates, students and researchers abroad, given China’s pressure on its citizens to provide intelligence. Traditional intelligence-gathering channels, such as diplomatic missions and academic exchanges, have also narrowed due to visa restrictions and the expulsion of diplomats.
Now, US intelligence in China relies heavily on electronic surveillance, but this is not a substitute for human intelligence.
Compounding the issue is China’s sophisticated human intelligence network and complex counterintelligence apparatus, which includes not only state-of-the-art surveillance, but also grassroots efforts encouraging citizens to report on family, friends and colleagues.
In response to the growing threat, the CIA established the China Mission Center in 2021. However, the CIA struggles with chronic underfunding.
While its share of the National Defense Authorization Act budget remains classified, it is notably smaller than the Pentagon’s budget, which reaches nearly US$1 trillion.
Unlike the Pentagon, which benefits from a vast network of contractors and lobbyists, the CIA operates with limited resources, and any budget increases come with strict conditions that complicate long-term planning.
These budget constraints hampers the CIA’s ability to act decisively. In contrast, China employs low-cost, creative tactics for virtual espionage, particularly targeting current and former US Department of Defense personnel.
Chinese state-backed media has responded to US claims about the espionage threat from China, accusing US intelligence agencies of exaggerating the danger to secure more funding. With US press transparency, CIA funding issues are publicly known — something the CCP closely monitors.
Chinese state-backed media have also cited several failed US espionage operations in China. Despite these setbacks, Chinese analysts expect the CIA to intensify its efforts, prompting China to enhance its counterespionage capabilities.
Antonio Graceffo, a China economic analyst who holds a China MBA from Shanghai Jiaotong University, studies national defense at the American Military University in West Virginia.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS