China’s “united front” gets involved in almost every aspect of Taiwan. In the case of Taiwan’s folk culture, this takes the form of “your deities and Buddhist figures all came from China.” Although the organizers likely did not have this intention in mind, this year’s “Welcoming the Wangye Royal Lords” festival in Pingtung County’s Donggang Township (東港) offered a clear response: Taiwanese folk beliefs are not only 100 percent Taiwanese, but one could even say they are “anti-Chinese.”
One of the highlights of the ceremony this year was the creation of a huge dragon mosaic out of slices of dried mullet roe, a local specialty. In ancient China, images of dragons were reserved exclusively for members of the imperial family. Even ministers and eunuchs close to the emperor in the late Ming Dynasty were only allowed to wear mangpao (蟒袍) “python gowns,” commoners were certainly not allowed anything even approaching a dragon image.
For ordinary people to appropriate so blatantly the image of the dragon or phoenix is tantamount to revolt against the throne. The same is true for any reference to “Heaven” and “Earth.” Theoretically speaking, worship of Heaven and Earth was the responsibility of the Son of Heaven; commoners were only supposed to worship their own ancestors. This is why the Ming and Qing emperors would refer to themselves as “Prime Minister of the Mountains and Seas” in their dealings with Heaven.
Many ordinary people in Taiwan worship the sea goddess Matsu, with no intermediary, as if they are usurping the role of “prime minister.” One could only imagine how eminent figures such as Han Yu (韓愈) or Ouyang Xiu (歐陽修) would react if they had served in Taiwan as government officials: They would surely dismantle all of the offending temples and shrines in which commoners worship the goddess.
The fact that these religious festivals thrive in Taiwan is precisely because this is Taiwan, a land beyond the reach of the imperial court. The court sucks the life out of religion. It is common to hear people calling on the gods to protect Taiwan during folk religious events, but one would only have heard calls for the gods to protect China during the Boxer Rebellion, with officials such as Xu Jingcheng (許景澄) petitioning Empress Dowager Cixi (慈禧) to do more to suppress the rebellion. The very existence of a folk religion tradition is anti-imperial court.
If the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) ever does succeed in annexing Taiwan, the dragon and phoenix imagery in the Donggang “welcoming the Wangye Royal Lords” festival would surely be accused of offending China.
Cultural activities such as religious festivals belong to the realm of soft power, whereas geopolitics is usually more concerned with hard power instruments such as weapons, technology and economics.
Sino-Japan tensions are also running high at the moment. There are historical traces throughout Japan, such as shrines, historic sites and stele inscriptions, of Qin Dynasty minister Xu Fu (徐福) sent across the seas by the First Emperor of China in search of the elixir of immortality (most of the references to the legend of Xu Fu’s arrival in Japan were taken to China by returning Sui Dynasty and Tang Dynasty envoys).
During the recently concluded election for the new Japanese prime minister, did China drum up the Xu Fu legend again? Did the CCP say to Japan: “you are all the descendants of Xu Fu, and by extension, all of your ancestors and gods all came from China”?
Jimway Chang has a master’s degree in history from National Tsing Hua University and is a high-school history teacher.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.