The recent arrest of a prominent politician who led a third party to run for the presidency in Taiwan is a wake-up call for political elites and the general public alike. Re-examining the political landscape and the national conscience is necessary to figure out why society is not providing the opportunity to make a great statesman, but instead a corrupt strongman.
It is unfortunate the strongman syndrome appears to be an ascending trend in the world, and this case is no aberration.
There could be several areas of concern: the leader himself and his subordinates, the oligarchs, the devoted followers and the judiciary.
For a highly intelligent person — a professor and a medical doctor — politics is not supposed to be his cup of tea, let alone the wheeling and dealing. However, an unjust power easily indulges a person in lust, pride and greed. That is why it is never enough, and would only lead to a tragic end. Unconstrained power is like a black hole, which accumulates even more power until nothing survives around it.
The first thing to consider when looking at a politician is his core values.
A responsible person would retire, resign or retreat when the duty is overwhelming, as clearly demonstrated by the graceful exit of the US President Joe Biden, who has revived the chances for Democrats to win the White House. He is a patriot in contrast to those who do otherwise.
Not knowing or not being involved with what subordinates were doing is the worst excuse that could be made by a leader, who should have proclaimed “the buck stops here,” as former US president Harry Truman did.
Not being in attendance is not proof of innocence. As Mahatma Gandhi said: “The world has enough for everyone’s needs, but not everyone’s greed.” Worse, just a few power-hungry leaders can turn a country or even the world upside down, as power can be intoxicating, especially when it is unconstrained.
While some subordinates in this case appeared to have stood firm in resisting demands to move illegal proceedings forward, the others enabled them through submission or for monetary and political gain.
The gold mine created by corrupt leaders and oligarchs at the expense of public interest is a “ring of power” that drives people crazy. For a strong man or woman, money is a stepping stone to more power, but for a businessperson, power is a stepping stone to more money.
In Taiwan, the punishment for offering a bribe is less severe than taking it, but few people can resist temptation. A three strikes law should be considered, with severe punishment for those who accept multiple bribes.
It is totally understandable that enthusiastic followers want their leader to win elections. Social media further amplifies the influence of a populist with a substantial following given the euphoria in cyberspace and beyond.
It is however important for the public to examine candidates carefully by “not only listening to their words, but also watching their deeds.”
The popularity of this third party appears to have plummeted. That shows that freedom of press is at work and remains strong in Taiwan, and the general public is capable of handling the truth, as it is not too late to “repair the shed after the goat has escaped.”
Prosecuting a prominent politician is one of the toughest tasks in Taiwan or elsewhere. The burden of proof falls on the shoulders of the judiciary.
It takes a village to raise a child, but it takes an entire nation to shape up a politician.
James J. Y. Hsu is a retired professor of theoretical physics.
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS