Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is going to participate today in the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue leaders’ summit hosted by US President Joe Biden in Delaware. The meeting of the four major maritime powers in the Indo-Pacific region — the US, Australia, Japan and India — is taking place against the backdrop of China’s assertive behavior in the South China Sea, its saber rattling in the Taiwan Strait, and increasing footprints in the Pacific and Indian oceans, which pose a serious challenge to freedom of navigation.
India has been bearing the brunt of Chinese belligerence not only on its land border, but also its oceanic frontier. Surrounded on three sides by sea, India is primarily a maritime nation. To the east, the Bay of Bengal washes along its shores, while on the west it is the Arabian Sea and in the south it is the Indian Ocean seamlessly connected with the Pacific.
India sits astride a very large number of busy international shipping lanes that crisscross the Indian Ocean. More than 90 percent of India’s trade by volume and 70 percent by value is transported by sea. India views the 21st century as the “century of the seas,” with maritime trade serving as a key enabler of its global resurgence.
While the coalition of democracies has been cooperating to face China’s belligerence in the Pacific, the US renamed the Pacific Command to the Indo-Pacific Command in 2018 in recognition of the strategic significance of India and the Indian Ocean. Earlier in 2007, then-Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe, speaking before the Indian parliament, articulated the concept of “confluence of the seas,” saying that the Pacific and Indian oceans were bringing about a dynamic coupling as seas of freedom and prosperity.
A broader Asia that broke away from its geographical boundaries was beginning to take on a distinctive form for India and Japan, he added.
Although India’s biggest concerns and challenges to its security and territorial integrity emanate through its land border to the north, China has also firmed up its footprint in the Indian Ocean, including in Hambantota in Sri Lanka, Gwadar Port in Pakistan, the Coco Islands in Myanmar, Chittagong Port in Bangladesh and in the Maldives, much to the chagrin of India. This has led to the coinage of the term “String of Pearls.” Apart from the South China Sea, China has also enhanced its footprint in the western Pacific, including in the Solomon Islands, with which it signed a security pact in 2022.
India has major strategic interests as well as economic and commercial stakes in continued peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. India’s view is that all nations must exercise restraint and resolve bilateral issues diplomatically and without recourse to the use or threat of use of force. India supports freedom of navigation in international waters and believes that the current regional security landscape calls for a cooperative and inclusive approach.
For its part, under the “Act East” policy which places renewed emphasis on engagement with the Indo-Pacific region, India has been an active participant in various bilateral and multilateral security forums such as the East Asia Summit, the ASEAN Defense Ministers Meeting-Plus and the ASEAN Regional Forum. India has urged stakeholders to comply with the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s July 2016 ruling in favor of the Philippines in its maritime dispute with China.
Pursuant to its “Act East” policy, India has been conducting naval exercises with the US near the Malabar Coast since 1992. Later, Japan and Australia began participating in these annual exercises to facilitate interoperability. In addition, India has undertaken bilateral naval exercises with most of the ASEAN nations, including Indonesia, Thailand, Singapore and Vietnam.
The engagement of India’s state-owned ONGC Videsh in hydrocarbon exploration in the South China Sea has commercial and strategic traction. India and Vietnam have renewed their oil exploration contract in the South China Sea. India has also extended a US$100 billion line of credit to Vietnam for procuring high-speed gunboats for its coastal defense. In a significant development, India and Philippines recently signed an agreement to buy BrahMos missiles from India. India also participates in Rim of the Pacific, the world’s largest maritime warfare exercise.
The Taiwan Strait connects the South China Sea to the East China Sea in the northeast, and so resonates palpably in the Indo-Pacific scene. All nations in the Indo-Pacific region, including India, have stakes in the peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait, and also in the preservation and promotion of democracy in Taiwan. India has urged restraint and avoidance of unilateral action to change the “status quo” in the region, including the militarization of the Taiwan Strait.
Rup Narayan Das is a Delhi-based China academic and was a Taiwan Fellow in 2022. The views expressed here are personal.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS