The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) has disingenuously attempted to compare its chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) with former South African president Nelson Mandela, framing a narrative for Ko’s arrest by saying that “the Democratic Progressive Party [DPP] is oppressing A-bei [Ko],” and that “the international community will not stand for it.”
However, nobody in the international community has expressed support for Ko, with the exception of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
During its first regular press conference for the summer, which it dedicated to Ko’s plight, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) accused the DPP government of conducting a campaign of “green terror” and oppressing anyone who did not agree with “Taiwan separatism.”
Furthermore, the TAO said that polling in Taiwan is concealing the truth.
The TAO is a foreign government organization more than 1,720km away from the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office, and yet it claims to have insider knowledge of the ongoing legal case. This is utterly absurd. Has Interpol considered moving its headquarters to Taiwan yet?
After Chinese officials proclaimed their “strong support for Ko,” Hong Kong-based news outlet China Review News Agency put out two opinion articles in quick succession.
The first article said the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was “being wishy-washy in voicing its support for Ko, and that it was missing a great opportunity.”
The second article called for the KMT and the TPP to “safeguard opposition party cooperation as a means of fighting the ‘green terror.’”
These two articles were published after the TAO made its statement. They are clear in showing that “backing Ko” is the real impetus for the CCP in this whole saga.
The CCP has already decided to “make Ko one of their own,” acknowledging that the TPP “has value” as useful idiots. The CCP does not want its fledgling “blue-white [KMT-TPP] coalition” to die an early death.
Even for those in the minority, such as TPP Legislator Chen Chao-tzu (陳昭姿), Ko is still a “deep green-leaning politician.”
Yet Ko’s positions on national sovereignty and cross-strait relations have apparently long been separate from the general view of the TPP.
Ko has several dubious and colorful expressions, including his statement in May 2015 that “one China is not the problem,” his description of Chinese and Taiwanese in August 2015 as being “one family on two sides of the [Taiwan] Strait,” the absolute gem from October 2018 that “Taiwan is just a pawn of the US” and his statement in October last year in the run-up to this year’s general election that “I would not completely refuse the ‘1992 consensus.’”
Not only do such proclamations fully align with the CCP’s ideology that “both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to China. We are opposed to Taiwan separatists and foreign interlopers,” Ko’s statements allow the CCP to continue to breathe life into its shambling puppet in Taiwan, the KMT. The CCP sees a new milestone in its war to annex Taiwan through a “cooperative partner” in the TPP.
The CCP’s “united front” is targeting the DPP and would not refrain from interfering in Taiwanese politics with its foreign proclamations. It is gunning for a blue-white coalition.
After Ma Ying-jeou [馬英九] Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) went on a special trip to China last year, former president Ma rushed to “head to the mountains” to act as part-time referee for a KMT-TPP coalition working group.
China Review News Agency pleaded several times that the KMT and TPP “join hands to monitor the DPP.” They also wanted KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) to “abolish the Anti-Infiltration Act [反滲透法].”
This is why Beijing is enthusiastic about a blue-white coalition and wants to continue manipulating the KMT and the TPP into impeding the DPP from leading Taiwan. The CCP wants to advance the establishment of a pro-China administration in Taiwan to make annexation all the more easier.
The CCP still needs the TPP’s sustained cooperation “to make friends with those who want to move Taiwan closer to China and oppose the green camp.” After all, it is difficult for the CCP to rely solely on the KMT to achieve its goals. The CCP has little choice but to support Ko if it wants to realize its annexation goal.
However, when the day comes that Ko’s “collapsing facade” causes Taiwan’s political centrists and young voters to look at supporting other candidates and parties, symbolizing the TPP’s devolution into a spent force, the CCP might withdraw all its “care and concern” and “betrothal pledges” to the KMT and the TPP.
I hope the TPP does not keel over and sink into the melodramatic romantic-comedy waters of “international [Chinese] concerns.” It should not forget that love from Beijing is a fickle, bitter thing — the reality of Beijing’s “love” is a matter of brutality.
Jethro Wang is a former secretary at the Mainland Affairs Council.
Translated by Tim Smith
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS