CCP silent on own abuses
On Tuesday last week, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) spokesman Chen Binhua (陳斌華) during a daily news briefing said that President William Lai (賴清德) had directed the courts to detain and hold incommunicado Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for the former Taipei mayor’s alleged involvement in the Core Pacific City redevelopment project.
Chen said that Lai was wielding the court as a personal weapon and implementing a “green terror,” adding that “Taiwanese ‘regional leader’ Lai is committing outrages and will be ousted by the will of the people.”
When I read Chen’s comments, I could not decide whether to laugh or cry. There is no credibility to anything the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) says, as China has no independent judiciary.
Ever since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took over the CCP chairmanship, numerous news stories have been published about Chinese officials disappearing without trace and influential business people committing suicide.
Last year, 25 high-ranking CCP officials and military officers “disappeared,” including former Chinese minister of foreign affairs Qin Gang (秦剛) and former Chinese minister of national defense Li Shangfu (李尚福).
In 2020, 260 officials and powerful people in China have turned up dead or were incarcerated while in office, including former China Railways Construction Group chairman Chen Fenjian (陳奮健), who apparently fell to his death from a high-rise building that same year.
Ko’s detention is a legal matter that was initiated based on evidence, with the independent Control Yuan carrying out the due legal process. The case is being prosecuted by a separate court and prosecutors’ office. Lawyers are deliberating arguments and Ko’s attorney is defending him.
Taiwan’s legal system provides guaranteed protections and judicial fairness. Moreover, the case has generated plenty of public discussion and commentary, including with the fourth estate — a free media — covering this and Ko’s other cases.
What fair and open legal processes and supervision of China’s “legal system” did those rich and powerful CCP and business elites have before they were dispensed with? Did they receive the benefits of a free and democratic system like Taiwan’s?
Were their cases evaluated based on legitimate evidence presented in a court of law? Does China’s judiciary ever make rulings independent of the CCP? Do Chinese lawyers work on the behalf of their clients or the government?
Is there honest and transparent social commentary and a free and open media landscape covering legal proceedings, or is it only the CCP that decides people’s fates?
The CCP is behind the wheel of China’s “red terror.”
Does the TAO even understand the latest public opinion polls of Taiwanese about the Core Pacific City case, such as a Next Media poll from last week that showed that up to 77.3 percent of respondents “definitely do not believe” Ko is innocent? Taiwanese are quite clear where they stand on Ko.
It is a shame that China does not have any organizations that are allowed to poll Chinese and ask them if they trust Xi, and if not, why? Is it because China’s red terror has stripped away public freedoms, and, at worst, taken lives?
Who would be brave enough to conduct such a poll? Who would be brave enough to be like a Taiwanese and say what is really on their mind?
Hsin-na
Taipei
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS