US and European companies operating in China continue to report record-low business confidence and profits amid geopolitical tensions between Beijing and the West and a slowing Chinese economy, two separate reports published last week by the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai and the EU Chamber of Commerce in China showed. The reports also found that more companies than ever are pessimistic about their business outlook in China due to Beijing’s failure to implement policies to stimulate and revive the world’s second-largest economy.
The American Chamber of Commerce’s report showed that only 47 percent of US firms were optimistic about their business outlook in China over the next five years, 5 percentage points lower than a year earlier and the lowest level since the US business group started the survey in 1999. Meanwhile, just 66 percent of the US businesses surveyed said they were profitable last year, a record low, the report said.
Similarly, 44 percent of European companies polled said they were pessimistic about their profitability in China over the next two years, the highest level since records started in 2012, the EU Chamber of Commerce’s report showed. Nearly two-thirds of respondents also said their profit margins in China had sunk to equal to or below the global average.
The reports underscore a trend of a persistent decline in foreign direct investment into China this year, which fell 31.5 percent during the January-to-August period from a year earlier, greater than the 29.6 percent fall during the first seven months and accelerating from the 26.1 percent decline in the first quarter, Chinese Ministry of Commerce data released on Saturday showed.
They also come after IBM Corp last month said it would shut down a key research division in China, affecting more than 1,000 employees, three months after Microsoft Corp confirmed it had offered to relocate some of its employees in China. Meanwhile, Taiwanese restaurant chain Din Tai Fung last month also announced it would close 14 stores in northern China by the end of next month, although the chain’s stores in Taipei, New York and London still have customers lining up to dine on a first-come, first-served basis.
While geopolitical tensions and tough regulations have long been risk factors for Taiwanese firms, China’s struggling economy has increasingly emerged as a major concern, driving more of them to repatriate funds to Taiwan instead of parking them in China for potential investment purposes, the latest data released last week by the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) showed. Publicly listed firms repatriated NT$65.6 billion (US$2.06 billion) of investment gains from China in the first half of this year, an 8.25 percent increase from a year earlier, the highest figure on record for the period. Firms — including those listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange and the Taipei Exchange — remitted their investment income, dividends and proceeds from share sales back home to align with their business groups’ capital planning strategies, the commission said.
FSC data also showed that 1,198 listed Taiwanese companies had invested in China as of the end of June, 11 fewer than at the end of last year, the largest decline in seven years for the same period.
The data reflect a trend that more Taiwanese firms have become cautious about their investment across the Taiwan Strait and are preparing global strategies in light of rising risks in China’s business environment and a slowing economy, along with the strained relationship between Taipei and Beijing and the intensifying rivalry between the US and China, not to mention fierce competition with Chinese firms who benefit from extensive government support. Most importantly, as Chinese authorities still do not understand the full scale of their country’s dire economic situation, they are likely to see more international firms scale back their operations there in the near to medium term.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS