Dictators always wear a poker face to look daunting. If they put on a smile, they must be after something. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) recently showed a smile — despite being a fake one, it carried profound meaning.
There is a communication channel between China and the US to avoid conflicts: irregular meetings between Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) and US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan.
Having met three times in a third country, this was the first time Sullivan visited China to talk with Wang, which he did for 11 hours. Sullivan even met Xi and Zhang Youxia (張又俠), vice chairman of the Central Military Commission and China’s second-highest-ranking military official. It was clear that Sullivan was given access to high levels of the hierarchy.
When meeting Sullivan, Xi’s smile was broadcast in China and in the world. While Sullivan is not a president, that he was afforded such a privilege made things interesting.
While US President Joe Biden still has a chance to meet Xi at the APEC summit in november, he will have no regrets, as there is no conflict between China and the US during his time in office.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is utilitarian. The US, its sworn enemy, is the only country the CCP fears.
While Biden is approaching the end of his tenure, former Chinese ambassador to the US Cui Tiankai (崔天凱), despite all his connections, could not arrange a meeting with Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump’s team. Cui had to be content with receiving incumbent US officials.
It was clear that Beijing had a favor to ask, trying to persuade Americans not to treat China as its biggest threat and not to sanction the country, as these sanctions are exacerbating its economic downturn, financial turmoil and acute unemployment, destabilizing its governance and weakening its diplomatic clout.
“China’s commitment to the goal of a stable, healthy and sustainable China-US relationship remains unchanged, its principle in handling the relationship based on mutual respect, peaceful coexistence and win-win cooperation remains unchanged, its position of firmly safeguarding the country’s sovereignty, security and development interests remains unchanged, and its efforts to carry forward the traditional friendship between the Chinese and American people remain unchanged,” Xi said.
Does Xi have dementia? Has he forgotten how he overturned the trade deal forged by then-Chinese vice premier Liu He (劉鶴) and Trump’s administration, Chinese surveillance balloons flying over the US, China’s support for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine despite US opposition, Chinese warplanes looking like US warplanes, and Chinese fentanyl being trafficked into the US through Mexico?
While Xi is courting the US, China is sticking to its four red lines: Taiwan, democracy and human rights, the Chinese path and system, and China’s right to development. The fact is the US did help China with its development; otherwise, how could China have become a member of the WTO?
It is China that has been ungrateful and has been trying to steal US intellectual properties. The White House changed its policy after China continued to rack up big trade surpluses.
Biden has, again and again, made it clear that the US is not seeking to start a new trade war, to change China’s system, to strengthen relations with its allies to act against China, to support Taiwan’s independence, nor to involve itself in any conflicts with China.
Xi does not believe in Biden’s words. Both sides could not meet each other halfway. Therefore, it would be better for Xi to save his smile for the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation.
Paul Lin is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Translated by Fion Khan
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS