China on Monday announced it was lifting a ban on importing pomeloes from Taiwan ahead of this year’s Mid-Autumn Festival. In doing so, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office emphasized that “Taiwan and China are one family and it is easier to negotiate things in the family.” It added that the two sides should interact on the basis of the so-called “1992 consensus” and oppose “Taiwan independence.” This clearly shows that the ban and its removal are politically motivated.
China imposed the ban on pomelo imports from Taiwan on Aug. 3, 2022, a move widely seen as a measure to retaliate against Taiwan for receiving then-US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi on Aug. 2 to 3. It is only one part of the economic prohibitions Beijing imposed that month, which included blocking imports of more than 2,000 Taiwanese products, ranging from agricultural and fishery goods to cooking oil and cakes.
This is part of China’s playbook of using coercive measures, including military threats and economic restrictions, to pressure Taiwanese sovereignty and democracy, and as revenge for engagement with the international community.
Flouting international regulations and cross-strait agreements to discuss bilateral trading issues through official channels, China has made it clear that selectively lifting bans on Taiwanese goods is a political tactic. In the case of pomeloes, China’s reopening is limited to a few farms in Hualien County and was announced right after a delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers, led by KMT caucus whip and former Hualien County magistrate Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁), echoed the “1992 consensus” and Beijing’s “one China principle” during a meeting with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧).
The same playbook was used when China resumed imports of Taiwanese atemoyas and groupers last year. The removal of the import ban on Taiwanese atemoyas was limited to 25 farms in Taitung, which account for a mere 3 percent of nationwide farms, and was announced after KMT Taitung County Commissioner Yao Ching-ling’s (饒慶鈴) echoed the “1992 consensus” and opposed “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤) in Beijing.
Additionally, China only resumed imports of Taiwan’s groupers from seven fisheries associated with KMT lawmakers, a move widely seen as a favor to the pro-China opposition party and to put pressure on the ruling Democratic Progressive Party before the nation’s crucial presidential and legislative elections.
Beijing’s coercive and arbitrary restrictions on Taiwanese imports have damaged cross-strait trading and driven Taiwan to diversify its export markets to reduce its dependence on China.
As the trade friction between Beijing and Washington escalated, and the Chinese economy slumped, Taiwan’s shift away from China, however, could be a silver lining, which has bolstered its economic resilience.
Taiwan’s exports reached historic peaks between 2021 and last year, including an all-time high of US$43.5 billion in March 2022 and a record trade surplus last year. China, including Hong Kong, accounted for 28.57 percent of Taiwan’s two-way trade last year, the lowest in 10 years and down from an average of more than 30 percent from 2015 to 2021, Ministry of Finance statistics showed.
The US (17.5 percent) and Japan (16.4 percent) have replaced China (13 percent) as the top export destinations for Taiwanese agricultural products since 2022. Taiwan’s pomelo exports have also expanded to new markets such as Singapore, Hong Kong and Canada.
By deploying coercive and “united front” tactics to bully Taiwan, China should learn that they only serve to alienate the two sides of the Taiwan Strait economically and emotionally.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS