On Aug. 22, China commemorated the 120th birthday of former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), the architect of modern China’s economic reforms. The event was marked by nationwide activities, including the issuance of commemorative stamps and seminars on the Deng Xiaoping Theory.
However, the highlight was Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) speech, which strategically leveraged Deng’s legacy to reinforce his own authority and vision for China’s future.
Deng is celebrated for dismantling the rigid Maoist structures that had stifled China’s growth, ushering in an era of economic liberalization and modernization. His policies transformed China into a global economic powerhouse, a legacy that continues to resonate deeply within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the nation.
In his speech, Xi lauded Deng’s contributions, emphasizing the need to continue advancing socialism with Chinese characteristics — a concept that Deng pioneered.
However, Xi’s invocation of Deng’s legacy goes beyond mere homage. In a political landscape in which historical narratives are powerful tools, Xi is reassembling the ideological building blocks of Maoism, albeit in a modern context. While Deng dismantled Maoism to pave the way for economic reforms, Xi is selectively reviving its elements to consolidate his own power. This approach is evident in Xi’s emphasis on the centrality of the CCP and his vision of a strong and unified China under his leadership.
Xi’s speech underscored the importance of the Deng Xiaoping Theory, calling for its thorough study and application to address contemporary challenges. By positioning himself as the true heir to Deng’s legacy, Xi seeks to legitimize his policies and strengthen his grip on power.
This strategy is not without its contradictions. While Deng’s reforms were aimed at decentralizing power and fostering economic freedom, Xi’s policies have increasingly centralized authority and tightened state control.
In this context, Xi’s commemoration of Deng’s 120th birthday can be seen as a calculated move to draw parallels between his leadership and Deng’s transformative era.
By doing so, Xi aims to project an image of continuity and stability, reassuring the public and the CCP of his capability to lead China through its challenges.
The commemoration of Deng’s birthday was not just a tribute to a revered leader, but also a strategic maneuver by Xi to bolster his own rule. By invoking Deng’s legacy, Xi is reassembling the ideological framework of Maoism in a way that cements his role as the central figure in China’s political landscape.
This blend of historical reverence and contemporary ambition underscores the complex interplay of legacy and power in China’s ongoing political evolution.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS