On Aug. 22, China commemorated the 120th birthday of former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), the architect of modern China’s economic reforms. The event was marked by nationwide activities, including the issuance of commemorative stamps and seminars on the Deng Xiaoping Theory.
However, the highlight was Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) speech, which strategically leveraged Deng’s legacy to reinforce his own authority and vision for China’s future.
Deng is celebrated for dismantling the rigid Maoist structures that had stifled China’s growth, ushering in an era of economic liberalization and modernization. His policies transformed China into a global economic powerhouse, a legacy that continues to resonate deeply within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the nation.
In his speech, Xi lauded Deng’s contributions, emphasizing the need to continue advancing socialism with Chinese characteristics — a concept that Deng pioneered.
However, Xi’s invocation of Deng’s legacy goes beyond mere homage. In a political landscape in which historical narratives are powerful tools, Xi is reassembling the ideological building blocks of Maoism, albeit in a modern context. While Deng dismantled Maoism to pave the way for economic reforms, Xi is selectively reviving its elements to consolidate his own power. This approach is evident in Xi’s emphasis on the centrality of the CCP and his vision of a strong and unified China under his leadership.
Xi’s speech underscored the importance of the Deng Xiaoping Theory, calling for its thorough study and application to address contemporary challenges. By positioning himself as the true heir to Deng’s legacy, Xi seeks to legitimize his policies and strengthen his grip on power.
This strategy is not without its contradictions. While Deng’s reforms were aimed at decentralizing power and fostering economic freedom, Xi’s policies have increasingly centralized authority and tightened state control.
In this context, Xi’s commemoration of Deng’s 120th birthday can be seen as a calculated move to draw parallels between his leadership and Deng’s transformative era.
By doing so, Xi aims to project an image of continuity and stability, reassuring the public and the CCP of his capability to lead China through its challenges.
The commemoration of Deng’s birthday was not just a tribute to a revered leader, but also a strategic maneuver by Xi to bolster his own rule. By invoking Deng’s legacy, Xi is reassembling the ideological framework of Maoism in a way that cements his role as the central figure in China’s political landscape.
This blend of historical reverence and contemporary ambition underscores the complex interplay of legacy and power in China’s ongoing political evolution.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
RSS