On Aug. 22, China commemorated the 120th birthday of former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), the architect of modern China’s economic reforms. The event was marked by nationwide activities, including the issuance of commemorative stamps and seminars on the Deng Xiaoping Theory.
However, the highlight was Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) speech, which strategically leveraged Deng’s legacy to reinforce his own authority and vision for China’s future.
Deng is celebrated for dismantling the rigid Maoist structures that had stifled China’s growth, ushering in an era of economic liberalization and modernization. His policies transformed China into a global economic powerhouse, a legacy that continues to resonate deeply within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the nation.
In his speech, Xi lauded Deng’s contributions, emphasizing the need to continue advancing socialism with Chinese characteristics — a concept that Deng pioneered.
However, Xi’s invocation of Deng’s legacy goes beyond mere homage. In a political landscape in which historical narratives are powerful tools, Xi is reassembling the ideological building blocks of Maoism, albeit in a modern context. While Deng dismantled Maoism to pave the way for economic reforms, Xi is selectively reviving its elements to consolidate his own power. This approach is evident in Xi’s emphasis on the centrality of the CCP and his vision of a strong and unified China under his leadership.
Xi’s speech underscored the importance of the Deng Xiaoping Theory, calling for its thorough study and application to address contemporary challenges. By positioning himself as the true heir to Deng’s legacy, Xi seeks to legitimize his policies and strengthen his grip on power.
This strategy is not without its contradictions. While Deng’s reforms were aimed at decentralizing power and fostering economic freedom, Xi’s policies have increasingly centralized authority and tightened state control.
In this context, Xi’s commemoration of Deng’s 120th birthday can be seen as a calculated move to draw parallels between his leadership and Deng’s transformative era.
By doing so, Xi aims to project an image of continuity and stability, reassuring the public and the CCP of his capability to lead China through its challenges.
The commemoration of Deng’s birthday was not just a tribute to a revered leader, but also a strategic maneuver by Xi to bolster his own rule. By invoking Deng’s legacy, Xi is reassembling the ideological framework of Maoism in a way that cements his role as the central figure in China’s political landscape.
This blend of historical reverence and contemporary ambition underscores the complex interplay of legacy and power in China’s ongoing political evolution.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
RSS