In 2022, the public was stirred by New York’s new Republican representative George Santos, whose entire past, including his background, his education and his work experience, all turned out to be false. Santos, who is of Brazilian descent, claimed to have Jewish ancestry; he had also never been a varsity athlete of a prestigious school, nor worked in a renowned investment firm.
Moreover, it was revealed that Santos had spent political donations on personal luxury items, and the US Congress in December last year voted to expel him. Facing several federal fraud charges, Santos last week pleaded guilty and is awaiting sentencing.
Similarly, suspended Hsinchu mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), sworn into office in 2022 with much fanfare, was last month sentenced to seven years and four months in prison for corruption in a case involving the embezzlement of legislative assistants’ fees. Last week, she was further sentenced to 10 months in prison for defamation related to thesis plagiarism. The law has brought justice, and Kao is not far from serving time in prison.
Everyone has the right to participate in politics in a democratic society, but being given the opportunity to do so does not grant one the right to act without restraint. The rule of law is the cornerstone of democracy, and fraud and corruption violate this law, after which imprisonment awaits. In prison, the glory of the past becomes a thing of the past. Public officials must strictly distinguish between public and private finances, and adhering to basic legal and moral standards is the bare minimum.
The financial accounts of Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have lately come under investigation. Bookkeeping is quite simple, using accounting software to record all income and expenses, and keeping tabs on all receipts and invoices. Auditors verify the accounts by cross-checking receipts and confirming the figures. There is no such thing as accounts that are not clear unless the person in charge does not want others to know the truth.
TPP leaders can continue their attempts to deceive the public, just as Kao had tried to fool the judge about her thesis, with lawyers and doctors of law by her side joining her charade of lies. However, all these would be meaningless once the judicial authorities get hold of the financial accounts and the truth comes out.
Politics is a public matter and should be pursued with the public’s best interests in mind. If all Ko can think about is purchasing a NT$120 million (US$3.8 million) luxury house, which he said doctors can easily afford, would it not be better for him to go back to being a doctor? Seeing how Kao now faces years in prison, Ko might find out too late that there is no going back for him.
Mike Chang is an accountant based in California.
Translated by Wang Yun-fei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS