In the end, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida could not escape the pull of gravity.
Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party is elect its new leader late next month, and in the past few weeks, the momentum in Tokyo had been swinging one way: That the unpopular but famously stubborn Kishida would run, and win, as potential successors demurred and bided their time for a better opportunity.
That momentum suddenly ran out on Wednesday when, in the midst of the normally lazy Obon holiday season, the prime minister announced he would not seek another term as LDP head, effectively tendering his resignation and throwing the race for Japan’s next leader into chaos.
Parallels are there to be drawn with Joe Biden, the US president with whom he deepened the bilateral alliance. While the millstones around Kishida’s neck are different — his age is not the issue; the controversy is centered on the LDP’s funding scandal and ties to the Unification Church — the upshot is the same.
Despite their long list of policy achievements, both leaders struggled to reconnect with the public as they once had, and members further down the ticket began to eye the possibility of a national election, asking how much longer the situation could continue like this.
Like Biden before him, Kishida bowed to polling reality. Yet unlike the US president’s swift endorsement of Kamala Harris, there is as yet no heir-apparent in Japan.
“We must show a new and changed LDP to the people,” Kishida told reporters on Wednesday. “To do that, we need a transparent, open election and above all, a free and open debate.”
Lawmakers and party members are to make their choice next month, and with no general election required until October next year, their selection will determine the country’s next leader. (However, the new prime minister might choose to call a snap national vote, as Kishida did.)
It sets the stage for the most interesting leadership vote in the country since the late Shinzo Abe made his shocking return 12 years ago, at a time when the LDP was still in opposition. During Abe’s years in power, he faced little real competition, and when he stepped down due to ill-health in 2020, the party quickly rallied around his right-hand man, Yoshihide Suga. Kishida was a logical choice the following year when Suga declined to seek a new mandate.
This time, all bets are off — at least right now. The potential for a left-of-field candidate, perhaps perennial maverick challengers Taro Kono or Shigeru Ishiba, who both have held senior ministerial portfolios, has rarely been higher. Shinjiro Koizumi, the son of the famed rebel Junichiro, might decide his time to run has come at last. Takayuki Kobayashi, a former economic security minister, keeps popping up in media reports. Support from the party’s senior leaders, former prime ministers Taro Aso, Suga and the incumbent himself, will be crucial. However, with most of the LDP’s factions disbanded in the aftermath of the funding scandal, it is hard to know how lawmakers might vote. Up against a weak opposition, the LDP almost always wins national elections.
Whoever succeeds him, Kishida will leave a mixed legacy of both accomplishments and baggage. His record on defense and foreign policy speaks for itself; it is no coincidence that US Ambassador Rahm Emanuel, Japan’s biggest cheerleader, was among the first to issue praise. He hailed the “new era of relations” ushered in over the past three years and has spoken of how the prime minister could do what his predecessor Abe could not: double defense spending, relax defense export rules and restore ties with South Korea, all without sparking mass protests.
With China doves within the LDP a dying breed these days, any successor seems unlikely to rock the boat too much here — though the likes of Japanese Minister for Economic Security Sanae Takaichi might move things further right. However, it is at home where things need most attention. Kishida’s “New Capitalism” economic policy was a busted flush, spooking markets and earning him the derisive (and undeserved) nickname of “Tax-Hike Four Eyes.” His replacement will need a better focus on the domestic economy.
Kishida also leaves with his promise of salary hikes above inflation only beginning to have impact, with real wages finally rising in June for the first time in 27 months. He should have taken a victory lap on defeating deflation; instead, the public still frets about inflation and the weak yen. His replacement will have to deal with any further market ructions caused by the rate hikes of Kishida’s pick to lead the Bank of Japan, Kazuo Ueda.
With more than a month to go, it is entirely possible that rather than air dirty laundry in public, the party would coalesce around a mainstream candidate: Minister of Foreign Affairs Yoko Kamikawa, perhaps, or policy heavyweight Toshimitsu Motegi.
However, potential challengers should take a tip from Kishida, known to be a voracious reader. One of the prime minister’s favorite books is reportedly Crime and Punishment.
As Dostoyevsky wrote in the book, “power is only vouchsafed to the man who dares to stoop and pick it up ... one has only to dare.”
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS