The saga of Algerian boxer Imane Khelif at the Olympics. The explosive Times feature about “tradwife” Hannah Neeleman. Whatever has happened to US Republican vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance to make him once insist that a coven of vengeful witches — sorry, “childless cat ladies” — are hexing ruin on people’s lives.
They are not news stories. They are concurrent threads in the dystopian nightmare being woven for Western women by the kind of far-right political forces you would not want near you to darn your damn socks.
Khelif’s crime — in the eyes and relentless social media feeds of the “let us tell you how women should look, act, reproduce, breathe and exist on this earth” brigade — lies in choosing not to portray herself as an aspirational Sports Illustrated swimsuit model when her job as a professional athlete is, literally, to punch other people in the face.
There is an online community of “transvestigators” who spend their days with Adobe Photoshop filters and an alarmingly fragile sense of personal identity determining every prominent woman who takes her work seriously must secretly be a man, lest the confections of gender that they cling to collapse in the face of, um, concrete evidence to the contrary. They have been going on about former US first lady Michelle Obama in this way for years.
Do not be fooled by their rhetoric into thinking that Khelif terrifies, because of her height or strength. It is taking the sport of boxing seriously enough to pop her opponent’s nose rather than flailing about like a hapless doily in a boxer costume that is the issue.
There is, you see, a preferred model of femininity for those in the yelping far right, and it is of the pretty, homebound, jobless kind that spawns children in the quantities of a brood animal. This demand reflects a masculinity so delicate it relies on the economic and physical dependence of a partnered woman to provide the comparative illusion of strength — it is packaged online as a fantasy product for weak men by the “tradwife” accounts.
There are bleak laughs to be had at the inherent structural hypocrisy of women insisting on the value of a life of domestic service when they are running for-profit media enterprises from their kitchens. The chuckles, sadly, are thin when one reads the Times piece about Neeleman, the tradwife queen of Ballerina Farm.
Neeleman insists her loving husband did not bully her out of Juilliard dance school, and she disputes he answers her questions for her, but his own admission that the domestic labor around their eight children their “traditional” marriage obliges leaves her “so sick with exhaustion that she can’t get out of bed for a week” sure reads as slightly creepy from the son of a billionaire. Maybe this life was “her choice,” but one wonders if an older Neeleman might consider it a shit one. Note: The value of women in such a “patriarchal bargain” decreases as the years pass and these external standards of “feminine” beauty become harder to physically satisfy.
That specter of the valueless aged woman underscores the misogyny of the “childless cat ladies” theme of Vance. The aspiring US vice president spent his week deliberately stalking his nemesis, Democratic presidential candidate US Vice President Kamala Harris, from rally location to rally location. The optics of him alongside a besuited gang of smarmy white men on an airport tarmac resembled way too much the kind of swaggering tableaux that would inspire me to flee an office Christmas long before any drinks were served.
These are hardly isolated examples — so why is the new sexism happening? Yes, the Internet, yes, its infrastructure of coordinated amplification. However, I have come to believe the recent angry discourse of woman-hating has been triggered by a generational phenomenon.
The women of Generation X — my generation, of which Harris is arguably a part — lived in the golden window of womanhood where sex could be casual and fun, and largely untainted by the cruelties encouraged by Internet porn. Where the feminist promise encouraged education, careers and financial self-sufficiently as liberation.
Daughters of the Cold War who never expected to live past 30, we are now perimenopausal and menopausal with an aggressive “screw you, you’re not the boss of me” punk energy that is entirely unprecedented, and we have joined the global leadership generation.
We are changing things. In Australia, Generation X women’s leadership is fighting medical misogyny, gaining fair pay in feminized industries, making reproductive rights sacrosanct and legislating against gendered violence. The female generation who moshed were always in it for a good time, not a long time — but we know tangible material changes that we make are hard to undo. So do the far right, so they try to legislate women’s containment and terrify the younger women — the Khelifs, the daughters of Vance voters — about the price of stepping out of line. Humiliation. Undesirability.
There is an alternative. It is the punk enthusiasm to revel in everything that upsets these jerks. Be proud of our education. Love our careers. Determine the shape of our own families.
The Swifties get it: Ditch the boys and party on with other girls — banding together organizationally, electorally and socially. Vote for a woman not because she is a woman, but because she is the best at the job. Let them cry about it; keep boxing.
There is a lesson that Generation X learned from one of our seminal texts — the nuclear anxiety movie WarGames — that instructs us how to fight the right’s gender war, whether you are a childless cat lady, a harassed champion boxer or a suffering stay-at-home wife.
“The only winning move is not to play.”
Van Badham is a Guardian Australia columnist.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS