Minnesota Governor and Democratic US vice presidential candidate Tim Walz has connections to China dating back decades that could help inform US Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ approach to the world’s second-biggest economy, but might also spell trouble with leaders in Beijing and Republicans back home.
The little-known Minnesota governor taught English in China’s southern Guangdong Province in 1989 and 1990, making him the first person on a presidential ticket to have that kind of experience living in the country since former US president George H.W. Bush, who served as US ambassador in Beijing in the 1970s. Walz has often spoken affectionately about Chinese.
“If they had the proper leadership, there are no limits on what they could accomplish,” he told a local newspaper after returning from China in 1990. “They are such kind, generous, capable people.”
Walz got married on the fifth anniversary of the deadly 1989 Tiananmen Square military crackdown, with his wife Gwen telling a local newspaper: “He wanted to have a date he’ll always remember.”
He has also posted on social media that he had a “life-changing” lunch with the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan spiritual leader exiled by China.
His interest in the country has also extended to policymaking, with Walz cosponsoring numerous pieces of legislation in the US House of Representatives including the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2017.
Walz was the only Democratic lawmaker in the House of Representatives willing to support the bill, said Jeffrey Ngo (敖卓軒), a former youth activist from Hong Kong, adding he “knocked on every door” to seek backing for it.
Ngo said he met Walz in 2016 along with fellow democracy advocate Joshua Wong (黃之鋒) and was impressed by the congressman’s knowledge of Hong Kong and China issues.
“This guy really knew his stuff,” said Ngo, now a research fellow at US-based advocacy group Hong Kong Democracy Council.
“He’s rare among members of Congress because he’s actually been to China so many times,” he added.
Walz also cosponsored numerous resolutions, including those condemning China’s censorship of the killings around Tiananmen Square in 1989 and ones expressing concern about the treatment of Falun Gong practitioners.
With Walz appearing prominently on the national political scene for the first time on Tuesday last week, many on social media began poring over a long record of comments on China, some of them decades old.
“I don’t fall into the category that China necessarily needs to be an adversarial relationship,” Walz said in a video interview posted in 2016 that focused mainly on agriculture that is now being reposted on X. “I totally disagree, and I think we need to stand firm, on what they’re doing in the South China Sea. But there’s many areas of cooperation that we can work on.”
At the same time, his views on China have tracked a familiar evolution from hope that an economic opening up would lead to greater political freedoms to frustration about what he has called China’s worsening human-rights record. His positions appear largely in sync with the approach of the administration of US President Joe Biden that aims to compete with Beijing in military and economic spheres, and cooperate where possible on climate or narcotics trafficking.
“I think the idea was, with a free market economy, we’d see a more opening of the Chinese grip on — on social life and on human rights,” Walz said in a US congressional hearing in 2016. “That simply has not occurred.”
Walz’s stance toward China — and his past meeting with the Dalai Lama — might open him to criticism from Beijing.
However, a Chinese official, who asked not to be identified, said the choice of Walz is unlikely to impact Washington’s policy as US politicians are unified in their hardline views on China.
In Beijing’s view, every candidate believes untrue and harmful things about China, the official said.
On the other hand, some of the governor’s more nuanced takes on the country from his trips could leave him open to Republican attacks during a tight race for the White House at a time when the China relationship is much more confrontational.
While China appears to be a personal issue for Walz, that is only good “to a point” and does not reflect the “zero-sum competition” between the US and China, said Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the American Foreign Policy Council and author of Countering China’s Great Game: A Strategy for American Dominance.
“The Chinese people aren’t Americans’ enemies, and Walz understands that basic reality — on the other hand, Walz seems overly optimistic, almost Pollyannish, about Washington’s struggle with the Chinese Communist Party,” Sobolik said. “Like President Biden and Vice President Harris, Walz seems to reject a cold war framing for US-China relations. That’s a bad thing.”
Spokespeople for Walz did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday last week.
“I lived in China, I’ve been there about 30 times,” Walz said back in 2016. “But if someone tells you they’re an expert on China they’re probably not telling you the truth, because it’s a complex country.”
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
RSS