Two big cultural events this summer, the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics and the release of Deadpool & Wolverine, both offer dazzling spectacles saturated by irony, but that is about all they have in common, and by analyzing their differences, we can better appreciate the profoundly ambiguous nature of irony today.
Ironic distance toward the prevailing social order often functions as a barely veiled form of conformism. As Wendy Ide of the Observer wrote of Deadpool & Wolverine, which is merely the latest installment in an apparently never-ending cycle of Marvel superhero blockbusters, the movie “can be obnoxious and simultaneously very funny ... but it’s also slapdash, repetitive, and shoddy looking, with an overreliance on meme-derived gags and achingly meta comic fan in-jokes.”
What a perfect description of how ideology functions today.
Illustration: Mountain People
Knowing that nobody takes its central message seriously any longer, it offers self-referential jokes, multiverse-hopping and smarmy asides that break the fourth wall. This same approach — irony in the service of the status quo — is also how much of the public endures an increasingly mad and violent world.
However, Thomas Jolly, director of the Olympic opening ceremony, reminds us that a different mode of irony is also available. Although he closely followed the Olympic Charter in showcasing the host city and French culture, he was widely criticized. Putting aside the Catholics who mistook the depiction of Bacchanalian festivities as a mockery of the Last Supper, the negative reactions are best captured by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.
“Westerners believe that nation-states no longer exist. They deny that there is a common culture and a public morality based on it. There is no morality, and if you watched the opening of the Olympic Games yesterday, you will have seen it,” Orban said.
This suggests that the stakes could not be higher. For Orban, the ceremony signaled Europe’s spiritual suicide, whereas for Jolly (and many of us, I hope), it was a rare manifestation of Europe’s true cultural legacy. The world got a taste of the nation of Descartes, the founder of modern philosophy, whose radical doubt was grounded in a universal — and therefore “multicultural” — perspective. He understood that one’s own traditions are no better than the supposedly “eccentric” traditions of others.
“I had been taught, even in my college days, that there is nothing imaginable so strange or so little credible that it has not been maintained by one philosopher or other, and I further recognized in the course of my travels that all those whose sentiments are very contrary to ours are yet not necessarily barbarians or savages, but may be possessed of reason in as great or even a greater degree than ourselves,” Descartes wrote.
Only by relativizing particularity can we arrive at an authentic universalist position. In Kantian terms, clinging to our ethnic roots leads us to engage in a private use of reason, where we are constrained by contingent dogmatic presuppositions.
In What is Enlightenment?, Immanuel Kant opposes this immature, private use of reason to a more public, objective one. The former reflects and serves merely one’s own state, religion and institutions, whereas public reason requires one to take a transnational position.
Universal reason is what we saw in the opening ceremony — a rare glimpse of modern Europe’s emancipatory core. Yes, the imagery was of France and Paris, but the self-referential jokes made clear that this was no private use of reason. Jolly masterfully achieved ironic distance from every “private” institutional frame, including that of the French state.
Conservatives are simply wrong to denounce the ceremony as a display of LGBTQ+ ideology and politically correct uniformity. Of course, there were implicit critiques of conservative nationalism, but in its content and style, it was directed even more against stiff PC moralism — or “wokeism.”
Instead of worrying about diversity and inclusion in the standard PC mode (which excludes everyone who does not agree with a particular notion of inclusion), the show let in everyone. Marie Antoinette’s guillotined singing head was set against the Mona Lisa floating in the Seine and a joyful Bacchanalia of half-naked bodies. Workers repairing Notre Dame danced on the job, and the show unfolded not in a stadium, but across the entire city, which remains open to the world.
Such an ironic and obscene spectacle is as far away as possible from sterile, humorless political correctness. The ceremony did not merely present Europe at its best, it reminded the world that only in Europe is such a ceremony even possible. It was global, multicultural, and all of that, but the message was delivered from the standpoint of the French capital, the greatest city in the world. It was a message of hope, imagining a world of great diversity, with no place for war and hatred.
Contrast this with the vision offered by the right-wing Russian political philosopher Aleksandr Dugin in an interview with the Brazilian journalist Pepe Escobar. For Dugin, Europe is now irrelevant, a rotten garden protected by a high wall. The only choice is between the US globalist deep state and a peaceful new world order of sovereign states. It would be peaceful, he suggests, because Russia would distribute nuclear arms to all developing nations, so that the principle of mutual assured destruction applies everywhere.
As a contest between the US deep state and former US president Donald Trump, this year’s US presidential election, according to Dugin, therefore would decide humanity’s fate. If Trump wins, de-escalation is possible — if a Democrat wins, we are headed for global war and the end of humanity.
Set against what people like Orban and Dugin think, Jolly’s message is deeply ethical. It is whispering to conservative nationalists: Watch the ceremony carefully again, and be ashamed of what you are.
Slavoj Zizek, professor of philosophy at the European Graduate School, is international director of the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities at the University of London and the author of Christian Atheism: How to Be a Real Materialist.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS