A Ministry of National Defense (MND) officer was quoted in a recent Washington Post story about Taiwan’s military as saying that there are not enough one-year conscripts to begin training to use drones, Kestrel anti-tank rockets and surface-to-air Stinger missiles.
The article said Taiwan was behind schedule in terms of strengthening training, which has aroused concern and discussion.
However, is the defense training situation in Taiwan being accurately reported?
The ministry swiftly responded to the article, saying that conscripts undergo different types of training based on military demand and expertise after they are assigned to different units.
Training to use new weapons would be arranged in relevant programs according to the acquisition schedule and operation demand, and would be implemented by the Training Command, ministry spokesman Major General Sun Li-fang (孫立方) said.
It takes time for conscripts to be familiar with the use of drones and Stinger missiles, which require a mindset that is totally different from the armed forces in the past, Defense International editor-in-chief Chen Kuo-ming (陳國銘) said.
Training soldiers with the skills to use drones is a huge challenge.
Some experts say that the use of drones might be hindered by restrictions set by the Civil Aviation Administration, and that the military and the authorities should step up discussions.
The annual Han Kuang military exercises this year did not feature live-fire drills to lower costs and minimize risks, while effectively testing the army’s responsiveness and strategic cooperation.
The military arranged live-fire drills in northern and central Taiwan a few weeks after the Han Kuang military exercises, conducting drills under heavy fire in Hsinchu and along the Dajia River (大甲溪) to demonstrate its military strength.
Heavy artillery with calibers of more than 155cm was used in the drills to test the mechanical performance and effectiveness of military training, Sixth Army Corps’ Political Warfare Department head Shih Shun-wen (史順文) said.
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) increases activities around Taiwan whenever the nation bolsters its military training.
The MND said it recently detected nine PLA aircraft and nine PLA Navy vessels operating around Taiwan within one day early this week. Six of the aircraft crossed the median line of the Taiwan Strait and entered Taiwan’s eastern Air Defense Identification Zone.
These are direct threats to Taiwan and require the military to maintain a high degree of vigilance.
The armed forces’ extensive surveillance and measures to counter the PLA’s provocations have underlined their preparedness and determination. Enhancing training and the ability to use new weapons have become particularly important given these developments.
The Washington Post report was possibly biased, not accurately reflecting the actual progress Taiwan has made in terms of military training. The Han Kuang military exercises and the following live-fire drills demonstrate Taiwan’s military strengths and capabilities.
Facing threats from the PLA, we must ensure everyone in the army knows how to use modern weapons by bolstering military training. It is the only way to counter external threats and guarantee Taiwan’s safety and stability.
Gong Lin-dong is a research fellow who focuses on the Chinese Communist Party.
Translated by Fion Khan
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength