Two national university professors were allegedly bribed to hire ghostwriters to produce their postgraduate students’ research papers so they could get their degrees. The extent of academic misconduct is jaw-dropping.
During the local elections in 2022, several politicians across party lines were accused of plagiarism. One was a council speaker, who had enrolled in an on-the-job postgraduate master’s program in the medical field, despite only finishing elementary school. His thesis was deemed plagiarism and revoked. As plagiarism controversies have involved both public and private institutions, it is vital to review the entire postgraduate education system.
Plagiarism has become less rampant thanks to the application of similarity detection software. Nevertheless, how could a person with only an elementary-level education get enrolled in a master’s program? This is because of the so-called “Wu Pao-chun clause,” which allows outstanding talent (such as world-class baker Wu) who do not have college degrees to pursue postgraduate studies. Finding it hard to recruit students, some universities have exploited the clause by defining prospective students as “distinguished people” to enroll them.
The Ministry of Education has worked on the issue, which has been gradually resolved. As such, the bribery and ghostwriting incident shocked many who thought the issue has been taken care of. The professors involved in the incident probably thought similarity detection software could not detect ghostwriting.
The incident indicates how corrupt a handful of professors could be. Every university should learn from this painful experience and exercise their gatekeeping duties to avoid further inflation of academic qualifications. Otherwise, supervisors who allow ghostwriting would become popular among students, while those who are serious about their jobs could only lament the chaos. Some might say the best solution would be to replace theses with technical reports, but plagiarism and ghostwriting remain a risk.
On-the-job postgraduate master’s programs usually charge students more and pay teachers more than regular postgraduate programs. Hence, they have become a shortcut for universities to source funding and improve the pay conditions of teaching staff. That might be why some teachers favor relaxing admission requirements and lowering the standards of assignments and research papers. However, that worsens the inflation of academic qualifications. It is important to insist on the quality of higher education and not exclude on-the-job postgraduate master’s programs in the stringent gatekeeping process.
Such programs can take a more practical approach in teaching, but it does not mean they can muddle through by replacing lessons with frequent site visits. It is the same with a thesis or technical report. Allowing a practice-oriented approach is not equal to allowing plagiarism, ghostwriting or tolerating below standard research papers.
These programs should not be a means to accumulate wealth. Instead, the revenue should be invested in the development and operation of the whole institution. Although there is no problem with providing extra subsidies to lecturers or professors who teach on holidays, the lessons should be included in normal teaching hours. The hourly rate should not be too high to avoid teachers pleasing students by relaxing requirements. There are many good quality postgraduate schools and honest thesis supervisors, but a few misbehaving people are enough to disgrace the whole academic field. A full review of the education system is vital to nurture talent in Taiwan.
Wang Chih-chien is a distinguished professor at National Taipei University’s Graduate Institute of Information Management.
Translated by Fion Khan
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS