Typhoon Gaemi brought torrents of rain, and with it, the parapet on a building in Hualien City came crashing down onto a parked car and killed a 45-year-old woman who was a passenger inside it. Her seven-year-old daughter was taken to hospital and is still in intensive care.
Article 77 of the Building Act (建築法) states that the owners and users of buildings are responsible for the upkeep of structural safety of properties. However, the walls of many older buildings across the country have structural issues and cannot be repaired easily.
Apart from requiring a professional assessment to determine whether outer walls need renovating or improvements — most people do not have the knowledge or expertise to make that determination, even when disregarding the regulations — repairing a single wall could easily cost more than NT$100,000. Even including local subsidies, many residents are simply unable to afford or bear responsibility of such a burden.
All these factors add up to create the expanding problem of structural deterioration.
If structural safety is to be maintained, residents of high-rise communities first ought to ensure that their walls and structural elements are regularly inspected and fixed, and that they have some knowledge of renovations. They should not procrastinate.
Beyond that, there is a need for official, objective third-party organizations to help with assessments. They could create a budget for maintenance and actuarial allocation methods for subsidies. With all of that, repairs could become systematized.
The buildings sorely in need of repairs are usually older structures. Most residents are retirees or those who lack financial means. Some residents are so destitute that they only have the four walls around them and little else. There is little chance that residents with limited financial resources can afford to maintain their buildings.
In Japan’s case, it has long had a repair reserve fund (shuzen tsumitatekin) in place to manage structural renovation assessments and repairs. A fee is collected each month for the reserve fund by the building community’s management association and the money must be used to carry out repairs every 15 years.
With this honed, localized system, Japan’s central government does not even have to get involved. Taiwan could benefit from adopting a similar approach.
For suspects in tort cases involving falling objects and injury, structural assessments and repairs should be mandatory. If repairs are put off, it might be too late to prevent injury for someone unlucky enough to be passing by. Towering apartment buildings and high-rise apartment communities could learn to become more self-sufficient and take responsibility for maintaining structural safety.
If everyone makes changes, communities would face far fewer instances involving concrete or debris crashing down on someone. In being more proactive, frequent “disasters raining down from the sky” can be avoided.
Dino Wei is an engineer.
Translated by Tim Smith
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS