Hsinchu City remains the richest and Hsinchu County the second-richest in Taiwan in terms of average annual household income, the Ministry of Finance’s recently released 2022 tax return data for 6.63 million households showed. Taipei ranked third, while four boroughs in Hsinchu city and county were also in the top five with the highest household incomes among the nation’s boroughs. The data suggest that the many technology professionals who reside in Hsinchu city or county and work in the nearby Hsinchu Science Park — the cradle of the nation’s high-tech ecosystem and home to Taiwan’s semiconductor industry — are becoming part of the burgeoning ranks of wealth in Taiwan in the past few years.
Residents of Hsinchu City’s Guanxin Borough (關新) reported an average annual household income of NT$4.611 million (US$143,877), up 23 percent from NT$3.747 million in 2021 and topping all other boroughs in Taiwan for the fifth consecutive year. The Guanxin borough warden told local media that of its more than 6,000 residents, about 90 percent work in the Hsinchu Science Park, mostly at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, the world’s largest contract chipmaker, or MediaTek Inc, the nation’s largest IC designer.
The rising household income in Hsinchu city and county reflects the effect of the reshoring of many Taiwanese tech firms leaving China amid persistent US-China trade tensions and a global supply chain realignment. It also comes as Taiwan’s semiconductor industry has gained a strong foothold over the years, leading the world in the wafer foundry, and IC packaging and testing segments, while ranking second only to the US in the IC design market.
The household income data show that the Hsinchu Science Park has for years created many of the nation’s tech upstarts, and it is fair to say many more would come from the Central Taiwan Science Park and the Southern Taiwan Science Park if firms continue investments in the parks.
The data also reveal hidden concerns for Taiwan’s economy: income inequality and imbalanced regional development. For example, the wealth gap between Hsinchu city and county and other areas in the country has been widening. In 2022, the average annual household income in Taitung County was only NT$834,000, nearly half of Hsinchu City’s NT$1.505 million and about two-thirds of Hsinchu County’s NT$1.34 million.
The data show uneven industrial development in the nation, with a few tech firms in the information technology and electronics sectors taking center stage, while non-tech manufacturers take a back seat due to price competition from Chinese companies, a weaker yen and the lukewarm recovery in the global economy. At the same time, the services sector (excluding financial firms), which accounts for more than 60 percent of the nation’s employment, contributed to economic inequality and relative deprivation due to limited wage growth for many years.
Based on regulatory filings in the past few years by publicly listed companies, employees with higher salaries tend to be employed by high-tech firms and financial institutions, while those with lower salaries tend to be employed in traditional industries. An overconcentration in any industry is always a risk, and Taiwan cannot rely solely on the high-tech industry. Not everyone can be an engineer.
The government should pay attention to the risks of overconcentration in industries, and implement policies to improve the uneven development of domestic industries and the uneven distribution of income. If a country only focuses on its tech industry, it would be like a stock market focusing solely on shares in electronics companies, which would not be good for the market’s development. Change is not easy in the short term, but not changing means fewer options in the future.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS