An economic slowdown at home has prompted Chinese firms to seek growth abroad, but the escalating US-China geopolitical tensions are getting in the way of doing business. Some are choosing to play down their connections to China. A few have gone too far.
The latest absurdity came from fast-fashion e-commerce retailer Shein Group Ltd, founded in China, but now headquartered in Singapore. In a speech at the Milken Institute Conference last month, Shein executive chair Donald Tang claimed it was essentially an “American company,” even though most of its suppliers are in China.
Shein has been trying to downplay this remark, wary of Beijing’s wrath as it still needs a regulatory green light to go public in the West.
The urge to pigeonhole a company — where it is from and the industry it belongs to — can be as ignorant as asking immigrants where their loyalty lies. However, sometimes these questions do matter. For instance, pitching itself successfully as a tech firm rather than a real-estate agent, WeWork Inc at its 2019 peak commanded a US$47 billion valuation. It filed for bankruptcy last year.
In Shein’s case, one can see why the e-commerce giant might want to cleanse its Chinese-ness. The retailer needs to go public and give long-time venture backers, such as Sequoia Capital and General Atlantic, an exit. Already, some investors have gotten impatient, selling shares in private markets at deep discounts. Being seen as a Chinese company limits demand for the initial public offering, especially from US-based pension and endowment funds, or global investors wary of Washington’s economic sanctions.
Is it even possible to erase one’s Chinese features? TikTok, an important marketing venue for Shein, spent years trying to distance itself from its Beijing-based parent ByteDance Ltd. It established a US headquarters and its chief executive is Singaporean. The social video app still faces a possible ban under a new law in the US.
Even some companies with no Chinese origins are under scrutiny simply because they want to capitalize on the country’s technology. For example, Anzu Robotics’ founding partners are American, its headquarters is in Texas, its drones are assembled in Malaysia and run on servers sitting in Virginia. However, since Anzu licensed the drone design from Shenzhen-based DJI, and about half of its parts came from China, lawmakers are frowning upon the start-up’s business model.
Nor would it be wise to downplay one’s ties to China. In Shein’s case, its main selling point is the expansive supply chain there. It contracts with thousands of factories across the nation that churn out tens of thousands of new styles daily. Shein and Chinese rival Temu are now attracting more repeat shoppers than eBay Inc, largely because their products are cheap.
To be sure, the anti-China sentiment is real. These days, whenever I write something slightly critical about the US economy or showcase positive things in China, I get e-mails accusing me of being a spy for the Chinese Communist Party. This kind of vitriol was not at all present when I was living in the US in the 1990s and 2000s.
I do not mind these comments, but some Chinese are genuinely hurt. Businesspeople just want to make money and keep investors happy. They do not agree with Beijing’s high-stakes jostle with Washington and certainly do not want to be the victim of it.
Some are also running away from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “common prosperity” drive, and want a fresh start abroad. Conscious of the political environment, the first instinct for many is to keep their heads down and pretend they are not Chinese.
It is a mistake.
From electric vehicles to smart home appliances and cross-border e-commerce, Chinese companies are gaining market share because of their access to the vast industrial catalogue and efficient supply chains at home. That gives them an edge, so they might as well celebrate it. There is no shame in being Chinese.
Shuli Ren is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian markets. A former investment banker, she was a markets reporter for Barron’s. She is a CFA charterholder. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS