The situation in Tibet is complex and sensitive, with reports saying the Chinese government is attempting to assimilate Tibetan culture into the Han culture.
China’s approach to education in Tibet has raised significant concerns regarding the forced assimilation of Tibetan children. About 1 million have reportedly been separated from their families and placed into government-run boarding schools.
The educational content of the schools revolve around the Han culture, with Mandarin as the medium of instruction. The system is seen as a large-scale program intended to assimilate Tibetans into Han culture.
The focus on Mandarin and Han cultural norms has resulted in Tibetan children losing proficiency in their native language and, consequently, the ability to communicate effectively with their elders, contributing to the erosion of their Tibetan identity.
The increase in boarding students is partly due to the closure of rural schools, which have been replaced by township or county-level institutions which primarily use Mandarin for teaching and communication, often requiring children to board.
The measures are part of what some experts describe as a policy of forced assimilation, which runs contrary to international human rights standards for education, linguistic and cultural rights, and freedom of religion or belief.
China’s constitution states that citizens “enjoy freedom of religious belief,” but limits protections to “normal religious activities” without defining what “normal” is. Regulations stipulate religious activity must not harm national security and control all aspects of Tibetan Buddhism.
The Chinese Communist Party promotes “Sinicization” policies which aim to interpret religious ideas in accordance with its ideologies, and emphasize loyalty to the party and the state.
There have been reports of disappearances, arrests, torture, physical abuse and prolonged det
entions without trials due to their religious practices. People have also reportedly died in custody or as a result of long-term illnesses and injuries sustained following beatings and mistreatment during incarceration.
The government has undertaken a large-scale campaign of “re-education” or “vocational training” in military-style camps to conduct forced political indoctrination, and to transform farmers and herders into laborers in other industries.
Authorities have also arrested writers, singers and artists for promoting Tibetan language and culture. Supporters of the Dalai Lama and other religious leaders could be arrested under China’s anti-organized crime program.
These are challenges faced by Tibetans practicing their religion and maintaining their cultural identity. They reflect concerns raised by human rights organizations and independent experts regarding the preservation of Tibetan culture and identity.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS