Montesquieu once noted that the full realization of a constitution demands that it is burned into the hearts and minds of every individual.
What a pity it is that due to certain historical factors of the political culture, Taiwan’s constitutional democracy bears all the markings of a representative democracy, and yet the path to its continued progress is plagued with obstacles. This is most recently evident from the blue and white camps’ aggressive pushing through of ill-thought out “reform” bills by dint of their slight legislative majority. In crisis comes opportunity, and we need only look to the Bluebird movement as an evolution of the Wild Lily and Sunflower movements.
First came the decentralization of power and ridding ourselves of personality cults, which, together with an overall healthy democracy, are important prerequisites.
Second, with the Bluebird movement taking flight across Taiwan, high-school students talk freely about the movement. There is a consensus that slogans on protest signs and placards such as “No discussion, No democracy” are core values of a democracy.
It is quite moving to witness this attitude of frank discussion of the matters at hand, but perhaps more encouraging is the constitutional tussle the executive and legislative branches are engaged in, providing lessons in constitutional law and democracy to the public.
Among other lessons, the centrality of constitutional knowledge, regardless of whether the result furthers one’s own agenda, and being concerned instead with the proper exercise of power and the importance of dialogue above and beyond overt confrontation or enmity, provides an excellent comparison with the arbitrary rule of China’s feudalistic despotism and of the casting down of anything the party does not agree with, and of the lack of any guarantees of freedom of expression to be found in that nation under that system.
Miles Yu (余茂春), senior fellow and director of the China Center at the Hudson Institute, has said that the Tiananmen Square protests that happened in China in 1989 are an unfinished revolution. Taiwan’s Bluebird movement, on the other hand, is developing opportunities to deepen Taiwanese democracy, evolving into a kind of “democracy, rule of law and human rights” 3.0, including the honing of a “constitutional consciousness,” as well as welding this consciousness into the hearts and minds of the public. Even more, it includes democratic discussions on the reliance on law and reason, and discussing matters as they actually are.
This would allow us to brush off vestiges of arbitrary rule of law, and get us to appreciate and cherish the democracy we have in Taiwan.
Lin Jui-hsia is director of Taoshan Salon and Humanity and Arts Institute in Chiayi City.
Translated by Tim Smith
In the past month, two important developments are poised to equip Taiwan with expanded capabilities to play foreign policy offense in an age where Taiwan’s diplomatic space is seriously constricted by a hegemonic Beijing. Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) led a delegation of Taiwan and US companies to the Philippines to promote trilateral economic cooperation between the three countries. Additionally, in the past two weeks, Taiwan has placed chip export controls on South Africa in an escalating standoff over the placing of its diplomatic mission in Pretoria, causing the South Africans to pause and ask for consultations to resolve
An altercation involving a 73-year-old woman and a younger person broke out on a Taipei MRT train last week, with videos of the incident going viral online, sparking wide discussions about the controversial priority seats and social norms. In the video, the elderly woman, surnamed Tseng (曾), approached a passenger in a priority seat and demanded that she get up, and after she refused, she swung her bag, hitting her on the knees and calves several times. In return, the commuter asked a nearby passenger to hold her bag, stood up and kicked Tseng, causing her to fall backward and
In December 1937, Japanese troops captured Nanjing and unleashed one of the darkest chapters of the 20th century. Over six weeks, hundreds of thousands were slaughtered and women were raped on a scale that still defies comprehension. Across Asia, the Japanese occupation left deep scars. Singapore, Malaya, the Philippines and much of China endured terror, forced labor and massacres. My own grandfather was tortured by the Japanese in Singapore. His wife, traumatized beyond recovery, lived the rest of her life in silence and breakdown. These stories are real, not abstract history. Here is the irony: Mao Zedong (毛澤東) himself once told visiting
When I reminded my 83-year-old mother on Wednesday that it was the 76th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, she replied: “Yes, it was the day when my family was broken.” That answer captures the paradox of modern China. To most Chinese in mainland China, Oct. 1 is a day of pride — a celebration of national strength, prosperity and global stature. However, on a deeper level, it is also a reminder to many of the families shattered, the freedoms extinguished and the lives sacrificed on the road here. Seventy-six years ago, Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東)
RSS