About 100,000 Taiwanese launched the “Bluebird movement” to protect freedoms and national development. The theme of the movement coincides with that of Belgian author Maurice Maeterlinck’s fantasy play The Blue Bird.
Taiwan has been free from the shackles of martial law for more than 30 years, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) remain stuck in the past.
To seize political power and benefits, they have pushed amendments that would unlawfully expand the power of the legislature and muck up the government in the name of “legislative reform,” harming human and civil rights. They are dragging the nation back toward the Martial Law era.
This game by the opposition parties has led civic groups, academics, industry and people from all walks of life to call out the inappropriate bills in unison, demanding that the Legislative Yuan recall the proposals for proper procedural reviews.
The Bluebird movement is a spontaneous civil action, galvanizing and amalgamating the public’s spirit. The overtures and refrains of human history rise like clockwork. Taiwan is being compelled to backtrack to an era of authoritarianism, forcing Taiwanese to relaunch the same civil rights movements from more than 60 years ago.
The thought of having to return to fighting to win back rights we already have is maddening and absurd. The proposals of the blue and white camps to “reform the legislature” would give the opposition practically free rein to do whatever it wants, as the amendments lack clarity and transparency. They would allow parties to abuse the investigative and interpellative powers, which could be used to summon members of the public for questioning, thus harming Taiwanese human and civil rights.
Through the “crime” of “contempt of the legislature,” the opposition parties could oppose the government’s National Health Insurance and social welfare policies with a swagger to their goose-step, broadly slashing away at policies that benefit Taiwan’s national defense, foreign affairs and economic health, as well as allow them to stringently review laws concerning cross-strait ties.
If the Anti-infiltration Act (反滲透法) is “reformed,” it would damage Taiwan’s national security, hollowing out the administrative powers of President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration. This would heavily affect national development and civil rights.
At a key time of uncertainty over Taiwan’s possible capitulation, sticking up for the nation’s survival and development, and protecting a free life and the right to freedom of expression — in addition to being able to rebuke opposition policies, and the words and deeds of KMT and TPP politicians — should not be cause for opposition lawmakers to conduct investigations, or to force those summoned for questioning to provide personal information or industrial secrets, and threatening them with steep penalties or imprisonment if they resist.
Industries throughout the nation must come together in solidarity and make persistent efforts to coordinate with the Executive Yuan to call for the governing Democratic Progressive Party caucus’ petition for a constitutional interpretation of the proposed expansion of legislative powers.
As debate and demonstrations continue across the nation, the public will gain a clear understanding of the harm the expansion of legislative powers would have on civil rights.
Through promotion of recall motions, the opposition parties’ proposals would be nullified, sending them back for review. By pursuing the Bluebird movement’s happiness and dreams, the public could spread its wings and soar.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat who was stationed in the US.
Translated by Tim Smith
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS