About 100,000 Taiwanese launched the “Bluebird movement” to protect freedoms and national development. The theme of the movement coincides with that of Belgian author Maurice Maeterlinck’s fantasy play The Blue Bird.
Taiwan has been free from the shackles of martial law for more than 30 years, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) remain stuck in the past.
To seize political power and benefits, they have pushed amendments that would unlawfully expand the power of the legislature and muck up the government in the name of “legislative reform,” harming human and civil rights. They are dragging the nation back toward the Martial Law era.
This game by the opposition parties has led civic groups, academics, industry and people from all walks of life to call out the inappropriate bills in unison, demanding that the Legislative Yuan recall the proposals for proper procedural reviews.
The Bluebird movement is a spontaneous civil action, galvanizing and amalgamating the public’s spirit. The overtures and refrains of human history rise like clockwork. Taiwan is being compelled to backtrack to an era of authoritarianism, forcing Taiwanese to relaunch the same civil rights movements from more than 60 years ago.
The thought of having to return to fighting to win back rights we already have is maddening and absurd. The proposals of the blue and white camps to “reform the legislature” would give the opposition practically free rein to do whatever it wants, as the amendments lack clarity and transparency. They would allow parties to abuse the investigative and interpellative powers, which could be used to summon members of the public for questioning, thus harming Taiwanese human and civil rights.
Through the “crime” of “contempt of the legislature,” the opposition parties could oppose the government’s National Health Insurance and social welfare policies with a swagger to their goose-step, broadly slashing away at policies that benefit Taiwan’s national defense, foreign affairs and economic health, as well as allow them to stringently review laws concerning cross-strait ties.
If the Anti-infiltration Act (反滲透法) is “reformed,” it would damage Taiwan’s national security, hollowing out the administrative powers of President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration. This would heavily affect national development and civil rights.
At a key time of uncertainty over Taiwan’s possible capitulation, sticking up for the nation’s survival and development, and protecting a free life and the right to freedom of expression — in addition to being able to rebuke opposition policies, and the words and deeds of KMT and TPP politicians — should not be cause for opposition lawmakers to conduct investigations, or to force those summoned for questioning to provide personal information or industrial secrets, and threatening them with steep penalties or imprisonment if they resist.
Industries throughout the nation must come together in solidarity and make persistent efforts to coordinate with the Executive Yuan to call for the governing Democratic Progressive Party caucus’ petition for a constitutional interpretation of the proposed expansion of legislative powers.
As debate and demonstrations continue across the nation, the public will gain a clear understanding of the harm the expansion of legislative powers would have on civil rights.
Through promotion of recall motions, the opposition parties’ proposals would be nullified, sending them back for review. By pursuing the Bluebird movement’s happiness and dreams, the public could spread its wings and soar.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat who was stationed in the US.
Translated by Tim Smith
A Chinese diplomat’s violent threat against Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi following her remarks on defending Taiwan marks a dangerous escalation in East Asian tensions, revealing Beijing’s growing intolerance for dissent and the fragility of regional diplomacy. Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday posted a chilling message on X: “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off,” in reference to Takaichi’s remark to Japanese lawmakers that an attack on Taiwan could threaten Japan’s survival. The post, which was later deleted, was not an isolated outburst. Xue has also amplified other incendiary messages, including one suggesting
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, entered service this week after a commissioning ceremony in China’s Hainan Province on Wednesday last week. Chinese state media reported that the Fujian would be deployed to the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the western Pacific. It seemed that the Taiwan Strait being one of its priorities meant greater military pressure on Taiwan, but it would actually put the Fujian at greater risk of being compromised. If the carrier were to leave its home port of Sanya and sail to the East China Sea or the Yellow Sea, it would have to transit the
RSS