If a person publicly announces information such as the age and gender proportion of people attending an event, would it contravene the Personal Data Protection Act (個別資料保護法)?
According to the Ministry of Justice’s explanatory letter No. 10703505830, if personal data can be used to identify a specific individual through comparison, combination or connection with other data, then they are within the definition of what the act calls personal information that can be identified by indirect means.
If the data collector has no indirect means by which to identify a specific individual, then the information does not fall under the definition.
So if the information is merely age and sex, without names, addresses, telephone numbers, e-mail addresses or other information that can be compared, combined or connected to identify any particular person, then the act does not define it as personal information.
Mobile signal data analysis that electronic communications operators collect are anonymized.
This includes data drawn from major activities organized by city governments or events such as the Taiwan Lantern Festival. There is no way personal information can be leaked in such a situation.
So when Democratic Progressive Party Policy Research and Coordinating Committee director Wang Yi-chuan (王義川) spoke on a political talk show about data — consisting of ages, sex and other details of people protesting outside the legislature in Taipei — the source of the information was irrelevant.
Whether the data were from mobile signals, estimates based from observation at the scene of the gathering or questionnaires, they could not be used to identify specific individuals.
Therefore, publication of the data did not contravene the act.
The attacks on Wang by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party, accusing him of using the machinery of the state to match personal information to individuals, are simply wrong.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a civil servant.
Translated by Julian Clegg
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
RSS