Newly appointed National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) Minister Wu Cheng-wen (吳誠文) and his deputies met with the local press corps for the first time on Wednesday last week after President William Lai (賴清德) and Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), as well as the new Cabinet led by Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) were sworn into office on Monday. On Thursday, the NSTC appointees answered questions at a meeting of the Legislative Yuan’s Education and Culture Committee.
On the two occasions, Wu said that the mission of the council — a top government agency guiding the nation’s development in science and technology — is to expand Taiwan’s technological advancement and economic development to the entire society and achieve “balanced and rapid” growth. He said the council would pursue greater cross-departmental and inter-ministerial cooperation to apply artificial intelligence (AI) and digitalization to all industries and propose an action plan within three months, and that transforming the machine tool industry into smart manufacturing would be one of its first tasks.
Wu said that transforming traditional industries and services would help solve the nation’s labor shortage and ensure balanced regional development. However, he also said that an important mission of the council is to provide long-term assistance and resources for basic research. Wu said that the council would never sacrifice academic development for industrial advancement.
It is clear that almost all of the policy priorities revolve around the local semiconductor industry and the information and communications technology (ICT) industry — two of the nation’s pillar industries, while enhancing Taiwan’s edge in science and technology industry is the council’s top priority.
However, it is still unclear what the council would do to improve the nation’s basic research. This highlights a perennial problem of Taiwan’s science and technology development in that resource allocation is heavily tilted toward industrial technology, with limited investment in basic research.
The most recent available statistics compiled by the council showed that research and development (R&D) spending nationwide totaled NT$898 billion (US$27.9 billion) in 2022, accounting for 3.96 percent of Taiwan’s GDP, the highest ever.
Of the R&D expenditure, technology development totaled NT$654 billion, accounting for 72.83 percent of the total, while about NT$175.4 billion went to applied research, or 19.53 percent. However, basic research only amounted to NT$68.5 billion, or 7.63 percent of total R&D spending that year.
Funding for basic research in other major economies generally accounts for 10 percent or more of their national R&D budgets. If only a small portion of the nation’s overall spending on scientific and technological development goes toward fundamental research, Taiwan’s long-term competitiveness could be undermined.
Unfortunately, the issue of more government resources being invested in basic research that the private sector cannot provide, and that competent people must be put in charge of the work, remains unresolved, despite several changes of leadership at the council and its predecessors, the National Science Council (from 1969 to 2014) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (from 2014 to 2022).
Over the past 30 to 40 years, the nation’s high-tech industry has excelled and become a major hub for semiconductor and ICT industries. However, with increasingly fierce competition from other countries and the rapid development of new technologies, pressure on the local high-tech industry is increasing fast.
Against this backdrop, the council’s new leadership should provide a clear vision on investment in basic research, as scientific and technological innovation, and knowledge accumulation are the foundation of sustainable industrial development.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS