Taiwanese are on the streets protesting what is viewed as a power grab by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), attempting to concentrate power in the legislature, where it and other opposition lawmakers have a combined majority, at the expense of the executive, blurring the lines between the legislative and judicial branches of government in the process.
It is not just that opposition parties are, in the words of the Taiwan Bar Association, failing to “substantively discuss or review the four bills before it,” but that these developments are taking place in a context in which China is threatening Taiwan, while KMT politicians appear indifferent, or worse, seem to be working with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to hobble William Lai’s (賴清德) presidency.
Concerns have been raised that the measures, which would grant legislators new prosecutorial powers to compel ministers to be questioned, and be found in “contempt of the legislature” if they decline, could be used to politically target individuals.
As Michael Fahey, an expert on Taiwan’s laws told Nikkei Asia: “The KMT is eager to start ‘show trials’ in the legislature exposing alleged systemic corruption by Lai and his allies. Renewable energy projects will be the main target, but they will also almost certainly go after the submarine program.”
This has worrying implications for Taiwan’s much-needed defense reforms. The development of the indigenously built submarines was only possible due to the secrecy of the project, where Taiwan was able to work with experts from seven states, including the UK, which Reuters said approved multiple export licenses for British companies to supply crucial submarine technology and software to Taiwan. The submarine program and all future programs like it could be in jeopardy if the KMT passes this legislation.
The KMT appears to seek to reverse the defense reforms implemented by former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). Many in the KMT did not support the extension of mandatory military service, nor the development of the nation’s indigenous weapons programs and transition to an asymmetric “porcupine” defense strategy, which the US and other partners say is essential to deter a Chinese attack.
KMT Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) described the subs as “undersea coffins.” Ma has served on the Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee since 2020, and during the last legislative session, filed 135 motions to reduce the defense budget by NT$180 million (US$5.58 million), freeze NT$1.29 billion and take away NT$300 million from the submarine program. Despite allegations that she passed secretive information about the program to South Korea and China, the KMT still nominated her as committee convener for the new legislative session.
Like Ma, many in the KMT have huge misgivings about the direction and orientation of Taiwan’s defense policy under Tsai. They see the nation’s accumulation of hard power as “provoking” Beijing, ultimately making Taiwan less safe. They believe it is naive to think that Taiwan can resist China, and that the only way to secure the nation’s security and prosperity is by providing Beijing with more “assurances” than the Democratic Progress Party (DPP) has done. In practice, this could mean arresting defense spending, winding down weapons development, working less with the US and drawing closer to China.
It is in this national security context that Taiwanese are protesting. The KMT, in its rush to placate Beijing and go after the DPP, is failing to assure the public and civil society that it can be trusted to defend Taiwan against Beijing’s encroachment.
As in 2014 with the Sunflower movement and a similar KMT “black box” treatment of legislation with national security implications, what is at stake is about more than legislative proprietary, it is the survival of Taiwan’s democracy. The stakes could not be higher.
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
RSS