Former Georgian prime minister Bidzina Ivanishvili has spent much of the past decade gazing down at Tbilisi’s ancient rooftops from his glass castle, a home perched atop a hill that his critics say resembles a Bond villain’s lair.
Since his tenure as prime minister from 2012 to 2013, the secretive oligarch has largely exerted his influence from behind the scenes and is widely described by many Georgians as the country’s shadowy “puppet master.”
However, last month, Ivanishvili made a rare public appearance at a pro-government rally to promote a highly controversial “foreign agent” law that has caused the biggest outbreak of unrest in Georgia in years.
Illustration: Yusha
Ivanishvili’s speech was laced with anti-Western sentiments and conspiracy theories, underscoring the extent the small Caucasian country has pivoted away from the West under his guidance.
Opposition parties have long accused Ivanishvili, who made his fortune in Russia in the 1990s, of loyalties to Moscow, Georgia’s Soviet-era overlord, which still regards the south Caucasus as its backyard.
Ivanishvili left rural Georgia in the 1980s to attend university in Moscow, and although other students made fun of his village origins, he has said he understood something that they did not yet: That communism would collapse.
It helped him make his first financial success, selling computers in Russia. Like other future oligarchs at the time, he soon moved into banking and metals, acquiring Soviet-era state assets through privatizations on the cheap. His wealth is estimated at US$6 billion, a sum that exceeds Georgia’s state budget for 2021, although many of his income sources remain murky.
“I could tell you anything and you wouldn’t be able to check it,” he said once.
When he returned to Georgia, he constructed the Tbilisi hill castle, as well as a series of lavish estates across the country. Still, he kept his identity a closely guarded secret, moving around in disguise and lavishing funding on artists or projects he decided he liked.
Ivanishvili spoke to the press for a brief period around 2012, when after years of living anonymously he announced he was running to be prime minister, setting up the Georgian Dream party and claiming he was fed up with the authoritarian bent of the then-government.
In one interview, he arrived at his Black Sea estate in Batumi driving a golf cart playing Frank Sinatra’s My Way, and proceeded to give a tour of his collection of zebras, peacocks and other exotic animals while outlining a vision for Georgia.
At the time, he said: “I will be in the government for a year, or for two years maximum, and afterward I will become an active member of society, to help society learn how to elect people and how to control their politicians. And make sure that there is a free press and a real opposition.”
Although he resigned from public office in 2013, his presence has continued to loom over the country’s politics.
“It is no secret that all the power is concentrated in Ivanishvili’s hands,” said Kornely Kakachia, director of the Tbilisi-based think tank the Georgian Institute of Politics.
Through the years, Ivanishvili has kept up his eccentric antics.
Angering environmentalists, he transformed a park by uprooting and transporting rare, immense trees from remote areas of Georgia to his arboretum in Ureki, a resort town on the Black Sea.
However, more troubling for many Georgians has been his party’s plans to adopt the “foreign agents” law.
The bill has been described by Georgian protesters and Western officials as a “Kremlin-inspired” tool to hound independent media and opposition voices in a country that has long teetered between the Russian and Western spheres of influence, but whose government now appears to be leaning toward Moscow.
The EU has made clear it would freeze Georgia’s membership application to the bloc if Tbilisi enacted the law.
Georgian Dream and Ivanishvili deny leaning toward Russia, and say the measures would increase transparency and defend Georgia’s sovereignty.
Russia is unpopular among ordinary Georgians, having supported armed separatists in the Moscow-backed breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in the 1990s and again in 2008.
Those who have worked with Ivanishvili say he has grown more authoritarian and ambitious over the years.
“He loves control, he runs the country as his dollhouse,” said Tina Khidasheli, who served as Georgian minister of defense in a Georgian Dream-led government from 2015 to 2016.
Khidasheli said Ivanishvili was aiming to implement the foreign agent law to further strengthen his grip on power before the parliament elections due in October.
“For him, it is all about keeping in power, everything he does is guided by it,” she said.
Khidasheli was troubled by Ivanishvili’s recent statements in which he bemoaned that Western countries were being controlled by a secret global conspiracy that his government was successfully resisting.
He went on to denounce the West as a “global party of war” that was attempting to drag Georgia into conflict with Russia.
“Ivanishvili always had a tendency for conspiracy theories,” Khidasheli said. “The problem is now that his views go completely unchecked.”
One of Ivanishvili’s fiercest critics is incarcerated former Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili, who accuses Ivanishvili of having him arrested on the Kremlin’s orders.
“Georgia has a long history of political vendettas,” Kakachia said. “Whoever comes to power tends to go after his predecessor.”
This means Ivanishvili believes that staying in power is an “existential question,” he added. “It is about personal survival.”
Pjotr Sauer is a Russian affairs reporter for the Guardian. Shaun Walker is the central and eastern European correspondent for the Guardian and author of the book, The Long Hangover: Putin’s New Russia and the Ghosts of the Past.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then