On April 23, the Constitutional Court began deliberating the death penalty. Whether it is constitutional is to be determined by the end of July at the earliest.
One Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator said that nearly 80 percent of people in Taiwan oppose abolishing the death penalty and revealed the names of the nine chief justices who are in support of abolishing it.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said that abolishing the death penalty should depend on the social consensus.
How people view this issue should be taken into consideration as well.
Even lawmakers from the same party differ on whether to retain or abolish the death penalty.
Although his party supports abolition, DPP Legislator Wang Shih-chien (王世堅) said that it is equivalent to depriving victims of their right to seek justice. Nobody outside a legal or murder case is qualified to forgive an offender on behalf of a victim.
Issues pertaining to the death penalty have drawn much attention among the public and have led to severe divisiveness and conflicts between supporters and opponents.
Most candidates during election season keep their mouths shut regarding this topic for fear of losing votes if anything they propose does not align with the electorate’s sentiments.
Some candidates even take advantage of death penalty issues to attack their political opponents.
The issues and relevant problems are highly associated with criminology.
Different criminologists say whether certain facts are tied to moral judgements depends on different interpretational stances.
DETERRENCE
Penalties are used as a form of deterrence. It is essential that punishments and their proportionality increase the possibility of deterring would-be criminals or copycats through fear of punishment.
REHABILITATION
The biggest purpose of a punishment is to make offenders turn over a new leaf and start behaving in a better way.
RETRIBUTIVE JUSTICE
Retributive justice proponents believe that whether a person has committed a crime, and the degree of their criminal behavior is a matter of morality.
People in Taiwan have not reached a consensus on the death penalty; human rights and mainstream opinion conflict with one another.
How can a compromise be reached? What could be more important than human rights?
Taiwanese should take the two questions into consideration and have a more meaningful and critical conversation on the issue.
The death penalty has been much discussed in Taiwan for a long time.
In 1990, Interpretation No. 264 — which says the death penalty is constitutional — sparked debate among supporters and opponents of the capital punishment. Interpretation No. 476, issued in 1999, also determined the death penalty to be constitutional.
Before the justices decide on the constitutionality of the death penalty, people should do nothing but respect them and the spirit of judicial independence and the rule of law.
However, the Judicial Yuan is still responsible for reviewing the topic of abolishing the death penalty, clarifying whether people who commit certain crimes should be given a death sentence or not after its constitutionality is determined.
Knight Chang is a political worker and doctor of education.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
As Ukraine leads the global fight for democracy, Taiwan, facing a potential war with China, should draw lessons from Ukraine’s cyberwarfare success. Taiwan has been enhancing its arsenal with advanced weapons from the West in anticipation of a possible full-scale invasion. However, Taipei should also consider Ukraine’s effective digital warfare, notably the “IT [information technology] Army,” a decentralized force instrumental in Kyiv’s cybercampaigns. In February 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marked the onset of a significant cyberwar, where fears of a “digital Pearl Harbor” in Ukraine were unmet, thanks to robust cyberdefenses backed by Western public and private support. This led
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is attempting to create an alternative international world order to the US-dominated model. China has benefited hugely from the current order since former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) opened up its economy five decades ago. Countries can be categorized as continental or maritime, and to a great degree this determines their optimum foreign policy. China is continental, as is Russia. The US initially followed a continental foreign policy, before it settled on a maritime model. The British empire was so successful because a tiny island kingdom built a formidable naval presence. The US-dominated world order, stabilized by