US Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel is known for not mincing his words. What has surprised is his target: the folks back home.
“I have a message for all the experts back in Washington: You don’t know Japan of today,” the former White House chief of staff for former US president Barack Obama said in January, citing advice he was given before taking his post about the need to tread slowly and softly. “Their predictions of what the future of Japan would be were myths. Japan has busted every one of those myths.”
I usually avoid the Tokyo embassy scene, but reached out to Emanuel because his take resonated. One of my great frustrations is with how Japan is perceived outside it, leading to what I have called a “comprehension gap” that reduces the country to stereotypes — or simply ignores it. Here was perhaps the first senior political figure I could recall making the same argument as mine, which is why I sought his perspective for my column to declare an end to Japan’s era of “lost decades.”
Illustration: Mountain People
“It is a different Japan,” he agreed when we spoke last week. “The United States has to update the way it thinks about Japan.”
Previous ambassadors, assuming they had much of a profile at all, often spent more time telling their host nation what to do — an approach that could grate, given Japan’s history as a US-occupied nation and Tokyo’s desire to be treated as an equal partner.
Former US ambassador to Japan Caroline Kennedy, the only recent envoy with a profile on par with Emanuel’s, ruffled feathers across the country when she criticized the Taiji dolphin hunt. Her office also issued a rare criticism of then-Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe’s visit to Yasukuni Shrine in 2013, just weeks after she took over.
By contrast, Emanuel is effusive in his praise — indeed, at times he seems to go above and beyond and stray into active boosting of the government, which might be more controversial if there were a more realistic prospect that Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party might lose power. (That still seems fanciful.)
I met the former Chicago mayor at the ambassador’s residence in Tokyo’s Akasaka district, beside the previously sleepy Toranomon quarter that has been transformed by a stunning redevelopment over the past decade. The historic low-rise residence, where Emperor Hirohito met with US general Douglas MacArthur in 1945, is now surrounded by glass skyscrapers.
It was late on a Friday afternoon, and Emanuel seemed to be feeling the effects of the week, having flown back to Washington for Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s recent state visit. Nonetheless, he lights up while discussing achievements in boosting national and regional security — at least, as seen from Washington’s perspective — put in place by Kishida.
“The guy implemented the most radical changes — in two years, not 20, without a single protest,” he said.
Emanuel lists the changes under the Kishida administration, including a relaxation of defense export rules, plans to raise national security spending to 2 percent of GDP and add counterstrike capabilities, and the smoothing of ties with South Korea. Despite his long time in power, Abe faced greater difficulty enacting much smaller changes.
Rahm contrasts the silence on Tokyo’s streets with protests in many democracies over varying domestic and international policies, from France to South Korea to the uproar in US universities.
“As a former chief of staff, I’m kind of impressed,” he said.
Kishida has benefited from the dramatic shift that has moved the US and China to strategic adversaries. When it comes to the subject of Beijing, we see the Emanuel that Japan might have expected when his appointment was first floated in the media — combative, hard-edged and distinctly undiplomatic.
He seems to enjoy needling China, and sometimes appears freer to speak about Beijing than his host country — such as his blasting of Chinese “hypocrisy” over the discharge of treated water from the damaged Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant. If reports last year that he was told by aides to US President Joe Biden to dial it back were true, the request was ineffective: Just this week, he wrote on X about a “Chinese pattern of plunder” surrounding allegations of doping in Olympic swimming and spying on European companies.
Emanuel also likes to hold Japan as a mirror to his own country to show the US where it has gone wrong, frequently raising the example of spotting young children walking home from school, alone or in groups, without fear of violence.
If there is one area he has strayed into controversy, it is his support for LGBTQ rights: Nationalists online decry what they see as his interference in Japan’s sovereignty with his calls for Japan to legalize same-sex marriage. Ironically, he has also taken flak from the other side too, with his backing of last year’s toothless legislation aimed at preventing LGBTQ discrimination.
Emanuel’s future in the country would depend on what is being called “moshi Tora” in Japan, meaning “if Trump” — the prospect of former US president Donald Trump triumphing in November’s election. Tokyo was caught badly off-guard by Trump’s surprise victory in 2016, necessitating an ingratiating emergency trip to the US by Abe to establish ties.
This week showed that Tokyo is taking no chances this time, with former Japanese prime minister Taro Aso dispatched to meet Trump in New York. Politically appointed ambassadors typically step down after a change in the White House — and Emanuel’s typically blunt work as a political commentator during the 2020 elections means any exception for him would seem unlikely.
For now, Emanuel’s the global cheerleader the Japanese badly need. He has a good story to tell — and he tells it better than most of Japan’s leaders. He is right about one thing: Regardless of who is in the White House next year, the US must update the way it sees its most vital Asian ally.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia, and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China. Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality,