If you believe the Chinese government, the country does not import any oil from Iran. Zero. Not a barrel. Instead, it imports lots of Malaysian crude. So much so that official Chinese customs data showed it somehow buys more than twice as much Malaysian oil as Malaysia actually produces.
Impossible? Well, of course. The reality is that China simply rebrands every barrel of Iranian crude it imports as Malaysian — the easiest and cheapest way to defy US sanctions, oil traders say. It is not a small matter: “Malaysia” was China’s fourth-biggest foreign oil suppler last year, behind Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iraq.
US lawmakers, frustrated with the White House’s passivity, are trying to force US President Joe Biden into action. On Saturday last week, the US House of Representatives passed the Stop Harboring Iranian Petroleum Act, known as SHIP. The Senate unanimously passed the legislation on Tuesday. Biden signed it into law on Wednesday.
The truth is, the US does not need new sanctions on Iranian oil — it needs to enforce the ones it already has.
For the past several years, either the White House has turned a blind eye to surging Chinese purchases of Iranian oil, with Biden seeming to be more concerned about rising oil prices than increased Iranian oil output, or the web of Chinese and Iranian obfuscation has outwitted US officials. I am not sure which would be worse, but the result is the same: Iranian oil production last month surged to a six-year high of 3.3 million barrels a day, up 75 percent from the low point of 1.9 million barrels during the “maximum pressure” sanctions applied by then-US president Donald Trump in late 2020.
At current prices, even after the discounts that Iran is obliged to offer, those additional barrels sell for more than US$100 million a day — or about US$3 billion a month. The windfall could not have arrived at a better time for Tehran, which desperately needs cash after months of street protests in 2022 and last year, and to support its proxies in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon and the Palestinian territories.
As much as the current system has loopholes, the new legislation has many, too.
First, it does not start applying until 180 days after Biden signs it into law. The earliest the first sanctions can apply is a week before the US presidential election.
Second, it calls for sanctions for those ports and refiners who “knowingly” deal in Iranian oil. However, it allows anyone to claim innocence if they can produce paperwork that says the barrels originated somewhere else: “A foreign person shall not be determined to know that petroleum or petroleum products originated from Iran if such person relied on a certificate of origin or other documentation confirming that the origin of the petroleum or petroleum products was a country other than Iran, unless such person knew or had reason to know that such documentation was falsified.”
Timm Schneider, an independent oil analyst, said that Iran has gotten quite good at ship-to-ship transfers, using variously flagged vessels, “which could make it easier for parties to argue they did not ‘knowingly’ buy Iranian crudes.”
Last year, Iran was the second-largest source of incremental oil production worldwide, behind only the US shale industry. So far this year, oil production keeps creeping up, with another peak expected this month just as Israel and Iran are firing missiles at each other. The new US legislation is unlikely to alter that picture for Iranian crude. However, the SHIP legislation could have an impact next year.
The act would require the US government to publish an unclassified report within six months detailing the true nature of Iranian oil exports, how Iran labels its crude and how it smuggles it.
The report, to be produced by the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), is likely to confirm what everyone in the industry already knows: Iran’s output is surging, and most of its oil ends up in China.
However, a research report by an industry consultant or even an opinion column by a journalist is one thing; if the EIA reaches the same conclusion, whoever is installed in the White House next year would have to respond.
The act would also require the US Department of State to deliver a “strategy to counter the role of” China in the “evasion” of US sanctions, with a focus on the number of vessels involved in oil smuggling between Iran and China, and any “interference” from Beijing preventing the US from enforcing the embargo.
The legislation is a step in the right direction, but it comes too late, with too many caveats, and leaves way too much discretion to the White House. Until the November elections, Tehran still has a green light to export as much oil as it can. After that, we shall see.
Javier Blas is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy and commodities. He is coauthor of The World for Sale: Money, Power and the Traders Who Barter the Earth’s Resources. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.
RSS