As global political landscapes shift, Taiwan faces increasingly grave security threats. From the conflict between Ukraine and Russia in Europe to the tense situation between Israel and Iran in the Middle East, and the issues in the Taiwan Strait in East Asia, these international conflicts not only highlight the potential risks of military conflicts, but also underscore the urgent need for Taiwan to bolster its defense budget to deter potential wars.
GLOBAL PICTURE
As a global military superpower, the US’ attention and defense resources are dispersed across multiple fronts. From supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression to addressing the tense Iran-Israel situation in the Middle East, the US is forced to distribute its military resources globally. These developments mean that Taiwan cannot overly depend on foreign assistance and needs to enhance its own defense capabilities.
Additionally, coordination and cooperation between China, Russia, North Korea and Iran has become an evident threat to Taiwan, with North Korea providing military supplies to Russia and China’s support with drones. These actions not only exacerbate regional instability, but also pose a direct threat to Taiwan’s security.
Furthermore, Taiwan must remain vigilant and learn from other countries in the face of global conflict. For example, Ukraine’s defense budget as a percentage of its GDP was about 3 percent before the war broke out, suddenly spiking to 33 percent following the Russian invasion. This underscores the importance of pre-emptively increasing the defense budget. Taiwan should learn from Ukraine and gradually increase its defense budget in accordance with the perceived threat level, ensuring it possesses adequate defense and deterrence capabilities before any crisis unfolds.
A NEW APPROACH
Taiwan’s defense strategy should be comprehensive, not only including increasing traditional military expenditures, but also enhancing capabilities in intelligence sharing and resource coordination. In new strategic areas such as technology and cyberwarfare, breakthroughs are needed. As professor Yasuhiro Matsuda from the University of Tokyo stated: “If you believe it, there won’t be any; if you don’t, there will be.”
His statement was in regard to a potential conflict in the Taiwan Strait, highlighting that rigorous defense preparation is the best strategy to avoid war.
Taiwan must immediately review and increase its defense budget, especially in the face of global conflicts and tense geopolitical dynamics. Strengthening the defense forces is not only a necessary measure to ensure national security, but also a duty we owe to ourselves.
If allies are able to assist us by providing resources, it would be greatly beneficial. However, without sufficient local investment, it would be challenging to convince the world of the nation’s readiness. It might also convey to the People’s Republic of China that the resolve of Taiwanese is insufficient.
Our investment today determines our future.
Chen Kuan-ting is a member of the Foreign and National Defense Committee at the Legislative Yuan representing Chiayi County Constituency 2. He was formerly the special assistant to the DPP chairperson and President Tsai Ing-wen, the chief executive officer of Taiwan NextGen Foundation, a researcher in the National Development Council, and also an adjunct lecturer at Tamkang University’s Department of Diplomacy and International Relations.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS